Decision Analysis for the Practicing Gastroenterologist 1. Reading a Decision Analysis Paper

Smith, J. Lacey
June 1985
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jun1985, Vol. 80 Issue 6, p490
Academic Journal
Presents a general exposition for readers of clinical decision analysis papers. Definition of clinical decision analysis; Five general questions to ask of any decision analysis; Advantages of clinical decision analysis.


Related Articles

  • Where's the utility in Bayesian data-monitoring of clinical trials? Ashby, Deborah; Tan, Say-Beng // Clinical Trials;2005, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p197 

    Background Data monitoring is now an established part of good practice in clinical trials. Bayesian procedures for data-monitoring of treatment trials have been proposed and used, but sometimes without explicit consideration of utilities. A natural statistical framework for evidence-based...

  • Impact of a cancer clinical trials web site on discussions about trial participation: a cluster randomized trial. Dear, R. F.; Barratt, A. L.; Askie, L. M.; Butow, P. N.; McGeechan, K.; Crossing, S.; Currow, D. C.; Tattersall, M. H. N. // Annals of Oncology;Jul2012, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p1912 

    Background Cancer patients want access to reliable information about currently recruiting clinical trials. Patients and methods Oncologists and their patients were randomly assigned to access a consumer-friendly cancer clinical trials web site [Australian Cancer Trials (ACT),...

  • When Should Re-consent of Subjects Participating in a Clinical Trial Be Requested? A Case-Oriented Algorithm to Assist in the Decision-Making Process. Dal-Ré, R.; Avendaño, C.; Gil-Aguado, A.; Gracia, D.; Caplan, A. L. // Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics;May2008, Vol. 83 Issue 5, p788 

    Investigators, sponsors, and institutional review boards have to decide when re-consent of clinical trials’ participants must be obtained when new information becomes available. We present an algorithm to help in the decision-making process, which takes into consideration the kind of new...

  • Are there adverse consequences of quizzing during informed consent for HIV research? Sugarman, J.; Cornell, A.; Donnell, D.; Liu, T. Y.; Rose, S.; Celentano, D.; Jackson, B.; Aramrattana, A.; Wei, L.; Shao, Y.; Liping, F.; Baoling, R.; Dye, B.; Metzger, D. // Journal of Medical Ethics;Nov2011, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p693 

    Introduction While quizzing during informed consent for research to ensure understanding has become commonplace, it is unclear whether the quizzing itself is problematic for potential participants. In this study, we address this issue in a multinational HIV prevention research trial enrolling...

  • Evidence In Practice. Hoppenrath, Terri; Ciccone, Charles D. // Physical Therapy;Jan2006, Vol. 86 Issue 1, p136 

    The article illustrates how evidence is gathered and used to guide clinical decision making. It presents several studies that illustrate this research practice. A paper by D. Trudel et al. was categorized as a systematic review, implying that the authors used specific methods to retrieve and...

  • Bayesian clinical trials. Berry, Donald A. // Nature Reviews Drug Discovery;Jan2006, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p27 

    Bayesian statistical methods are being used increasingly in clinical research because the Bayesian approach is ideally suited to adapting to information that accrues during a trial, potentially allowing for smaller more informative trials and for patients to receive better treatment....

  • Doing clinical trials large enough to achieve adequate reductions in uncertainties about treatment effects. Campbell, Michael J. // JRSM Cardiovascular Disease;Feb2013, Vol. 106 Issue 2, p68 

    The author explores the importance of clinical trials for reducing uncertainties about the effects of medical treatments. He notes that statistical tests are only applied once data are available for testing and should be based on the null hypothesis. He stresses the use of Bayesian methods when...

  • Randomized controlled clinical trials–support but not substitute of decision-making in surgery. Beger, H. G.; Rau, B. M. // Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery;Sep2006, Vol. 391 Issue 4, p301 

    The article comments on the role of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) in surgical decision making. The authors view that RCTs are fine in theory but difficult to put into practice. A RCT in surgery is the best way to show the highest degree of evidence for a new operative technique or...

  • Assessing the quality of research. Glasziou, Paul; Vandenbroucke, Jan; Chalmers, Iain // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);1/3/2004, Vol. 328 Issue 7430, p39 

    Presents a study to assess the quality of medical research and the evidence hierarchies that are prone to confuse practitioners and researchers. Use of hierarchies to determine the effects of interventions in clinical decision making; Use of randomized trials to give estimations of treatment...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics