TITLE

Trial Delayed in Holmes Harbor Bondholder's

AUTHOR(S)
Hume, Lynn
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;2/23/2005, Vol. 351 Issue 32076, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
16220970

 

Related Articles

  • Judicial Deliberative Privilege Trumps Subpoena Power. Anderson, Kelso L. // Litigation News;Winter2013, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p22 

    The article discusses a case involving a Massachusetts district attorney who filed a complaint with the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, alleging that a judge has been exhibiting pro-defendant partiality, bias and disregard for the law for 16 years in 24 areas of criminal law. The Supreme...

  • Unrepresentative Randomization: An Empirical Study of Judging Panels of USPTO Appeals to the CAFC. Froats, Thomas // Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal;Summer2010, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p79 

    The article presents an empirical study which examines the judging panels of United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Appeals to United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to determine if there is a truly representative cross section of judges involved in those...

  • SHOULD THE UNITED STATES DESIGNATE SPECIALIST PATENT TRIAL JUDGES? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF H.R. 628 IN LIGHT OF THE ENGLISH EXPERIENCE AND THE WORK OF PROFESSOR MOORE. Gitter, Donna M. // Columbia Science & Technology Law Review;2009, Vol. 10, p169 

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit currently reverses from one-third to nearly one-half of all U.S. district court patent claim construction decisions. Because claim construction often determines the outcome of patent litigation, the high appellate claim construction...

  • Annual Review of Developments in Instructions. Fredrikson, Christopher T.; Daknis, Wendy P.; Varley, James L. // Army Lawyer;May2011, Issue 456, p25 

    The article discusses court cases which received decisions during the September 2009 term of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF). Among the cases cited include the United States v. Smith which deals with obedience to orders, the United States v. Maynulet which tackles mistake...

  • The Arc of the Pendulum: Judges, Prosecutors, and the Exercise of Discretion. Stith, Kate // Yale Law Journal;May2008, Vol. 117 Issue 7, p1420 

    Early scholarship on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines focused on the transfer of sentencing authority from judges to the Sentencing Commission; later studies examined the transfer of discretion from judges to prosecutors. Of equal significance are two other institutional competitions for power:...

  • U.S. Trust to Argue vs. Liability In Illegal $20 Million Sewer Deal.  // Bond Buyer;7/03/2003, Vol. 345 Issue 31670, p3 

    Reports on an urge made by U.S. Trust Co. to Washington State Supreme Court judge Alan R. Hancock to reconsider its liability in serving as trustee for multi-million dollar in tax-exempt debt involving Holmes Harbor Sewer District. Class action lawsuit filed by U.S. Trust against illegal sewer...

  • Feds want action on Ohio sewers. Miller, Jay // Waste News;1/22/2007, Vol. 12 Issue 19, p12 

    The article reports that the federal government has filed a lawsuit on January 4 against the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District over the sewer district's failure to provide information requested by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The lawsuit seeks an injunction requiring the...

  • Both Sides Of US Trust Case Rely on OCC.  // Bond Buyer;8/20/2003, Vol. 345 Issue 31702, p1 

    Focuses on the role of the Unite States Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in a U.S. Trust lawsuit in a Washington State court. Possible impact of the lawsuit on municipal bond trustees; Allegations against the U.S. Trust; Brief description of the lawsuit.

  • Georgia Court Abolishes Use of Discounts When Valuing Shares Pursuant to Georgia's Dissenters' Rights Statute. Barnes, Anthony T. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q1, p1 

    The article presents information on the ruling of the Georgia Court of Appeals on the court case Blitch versus Peoples Bank. The Court ruled that the use of discounts is contrary to the dissenters' rights statute of the state. A dissenting shareholder should then be given his or her...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics