TITLE

Belonging to a Philosophic Discourse

AUTHOR(S)
Ross, Stephen David
PUB. DATE
July 1986
SOURCE
Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1986, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p166
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article argues that great works of philosophy, even the great philosophers themselves belong to the discourses of history. Greatness is not an intrinsic property of discourse--nor an extrinsic property--but is constituted by discourse. The great works of philosophical reflection are great because they constitute the conditions of subsequent discourses. Do they do so because they are great and we acquiesce to their power, or do we call them great because we cannot think philosophically without them? In this tangle, there are philosophic writings that belong to their time but not to the future, and others that fail their time but are rediscovered. This largely impenetrable future is the soil in which all discourses are rooted, determined by historical contingencies over which no philosophical writing can prevail. And this truth of discourse is not restricted to philosophy, but pertains to all discursive practices, from poetry to the sciences. What remains to be said is that this generic condition is matched by the equally generic condition that every discourse is constituted by the norms of its practices--norms that are as divided among themselves, though quite unavoidable, as are the practices in which they are situated.
ACCESSION #
16182636

 

Related Articles

  • Books Received.  // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1968, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p190 

    This section presents a list of books related to rhetoric and philosophy.

  • BADÄ°OU'DAKÄ° Ä°KÄ°'YÄ° DENGEYE OTURTMAK YA DA BÄ°R'Ä°N HESABA KATILIÅžI. DURSUN, Yücel // Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF);Spring2013, Issue 15, p171 

    This study focuses on the concept of Two, which has a considerable place in the Badiouean philosophy. It aims to show that, in the case of One is not, Two is in an unbalanced situation and thus, Badiou has fallen into one-sidedness. It intends to prove that Two can come into balance only when...

  • Rejoinder to Messrs. Johnstone and Perelman. Zaner, Richard M. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1968, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p171 

    This article presents a response by Richard M. Zaner to the comments of Johnstone and Perelman about his article Philosophy and Rhetoric: A Critical Discussion. For Perelman all argumentation is rhetoric and philosophical discourse is a particular kind of argumentation, namely one which aims not...

  • Is Détente Possible? Habermas and Rhetoric. Pollock, Mark A. // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;1987 Argument & Critical Practices, p191 

    The article focuses on Jürgen Haberma's view and perspective of rhetoric. Two key objections arise against rhetoric from Haberma's perspective and that include the views on rhetoric as techne or a guide to strategic rather than communicative action, and the figurative uses of language that...

  • Aristotle's Rhetorical Rhetoric? Gaines, Robert N. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1986, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p194 

    This article shows that, even on its own terms, Carl B. Holmberg's characterization of Aristotle's rhetoric is untenable. Specifically, this article demonstrates that both lines of reasoning offered by Holmberg in defense of his view are inconsistent with the very texts they purport to...

  • Reply to Mr. Zaner. Johnstone Jr., Henry W. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1968, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p165 

    This article presents the author's comments in response to the article Philosophy and Rhetoric: A Critical Discussion, by Richard M. Zaner. The crux of Zaner's critique of my view of the nature of philosophy is that although I claim that philosophical statements are noncognitive and do not...

  • Styles of Rejection in Local Public Argument on Iraq. Dimock, Aaron // Argumentation;Nov2010, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p423 

    campaign to pass city council resolutions opposing an American invasion of Iraq in the Fall of 2002 and Spring of 2003 provided an opportunity to examine contrasting styles of public argument. This paper examines an extensive set of news and editorial articles as well as the actual deliberations...

  • Some Antistrophes to the Rhetoric. Price, Robert // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1968, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p145 

    This article discusses six antistrophes of rhetoric: deliberation, evaluation, recollection, demonstration, dialectic, and rhetoric. But if anything has been gained from this inquiry it is not the recognition that rhetoric is different from the remaining arts; we knew this before we started....

  • ARGUING WITH A GOOD MAN. Wreen, Michael // Philosophy & Rhetoric;1996, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p65 

    The article discusses the aim of ethotic argument, which is just a word about belief, rather than action. It focuses as an outcome of ethotic argument, but as has been said that belief can also be the objective of an ethotic argument. First, "belief as an end has already figured in what has been...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics