TITLE

Wetlands Issues

PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
WaterWorld;Feb2005, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers said in December 2004 they would not issue expand federal regulatory jurisdiction over isolated wetlands. In 2001 the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County vs. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, overturned the Corps' assertion of federal jurisdiction over certain isolated wetlands based on the presence of migratory birds. EPA and the Corps responded with revised guidance to their field offices. At the same time, they reaffirmed federal jurisdiction over the majority of wetlands not impacted by the decision.
ACCESSION #
16110319

 

Related Articles

  • EPA, CORPS PROPOSE REFORMS.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;08/21/2000, Vol. 245 Issue 8, p16 

    Reports reforms proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers on regulations for construction activities in wetlands in the United States. Clarification of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; Context of the Tulloch rule; Implications for wetland protection;...

  • New guidance on Clean Water Act jurisdiction -- clear as mud? Keller, Mike // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;7/16/2007, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p10 

    The article focuses on the guidance issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency on their interpretation of their jurisdiction over tributaries and adjacent wetlands under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Both agencies intend to continue asserting jurisdiction...

  • Why is ARNI an environmental permitting stumbling block? Matthews, Frank E.; Savage, Amelia A.; Truitt, John J. // Trends (15339556);Jan/Feb2010, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p1 

    The article focuses on the usage and meaning of the term, ARNI in varied senses. It states that for federal wetland regulators, it stands for "aquatic resources of national importance." It highlights that in the context of environmental permitting, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has...

  • EPA and Corps Won't Draft Rule.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;12/29/2003, Vol. 251 Issue 26, p12 

    After starting to pursue a new regulation outlining federal authority over "isolated" wetlands, the U.S. Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have shifted gears and decided not to issue a rule. The agencies' announcement on December 16, 2003, is a belated...

  • Judge Backs Industry Suit Against EPA Mining Actions. RICKMAN, JOHNATHAN // Energy Daily;1/20/2011, Issue 13, p3 

    This article reports that Judge Reggie Walton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that the coal industry might prevail in litigation arguing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its authority in several regulatory initiatives aimed at cracking own...

  • Courts.  // National Wetlands Newsletter;Mar/Apr2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p22 

    The article presents judgments to several lawsuits related to environmental protection in the U.S. The case between the National Association of Home Builders and the Army Corps of Engineers resulted to the dismissal of the association's claim concerning its challenge of permit requirements for...

  • Public Comment Period for Joint Rapanos Guidance Extended.  // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p21 

    The article announces the extension of the public comment period by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Rapanos vs. United States case. The U.S. EPA, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have teamed-up...

  • Courts.  // National Wetlands Newsletter;May/Jun2009, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p30 

    The article presents several court cases related to environmental protection in the U.S. One of which is a case involving Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and Hurst which the district court ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the National...

  • Mining group sues EPA. Smith-Teutsch, Amanda // Waste & Recycling News;8/2/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p25 

    The article reports that the National Mining Association (NMA) has filed a lawsuit in federal court against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers after the agencies halted and delayed permits for mountaintop mining projects in Appalachia. As stated, in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics