TITLE

WTO, Public Reason and Food Public Reasoning in the ‘Trade Conflict’ on GM-Food

AUTHOR(S)
Brom, Frans
PUB. DATE
September 2004
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Sep2004, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p417
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Food trade is of economic importance for both developed and developing countries. Food, however, is a special commodity. Firstly, the lack of food - hunger, under-nourishment, and starvation - is one of the world’s pressing moral problems. But food is not only special because it is necessary for our survival; food is also special because it is strongly related to our social and cultural identity. Two recent transatlantic trade conflicts over food - over the use of artificial growth hormones in beef production and over the use of (modern) biotechnology in food production - show that food is a specific commodity. In these trade-conflicts, the obligations flowing from free-trade treaties collide with the cultural and social meanings of food. Current international trade agreements neglect this point and force countries to fight their case in the field of food safety science. This causes a bias in the discussion. Europe’s resistance towards artificial growth hormones and GM-food is not strictly science based; it is also culture based. For a fair resolution of trade-conflicts, this needs to be accommodated in international trade legislation. With the help of the notion of public reason I defend that (i) precaution with regard to scientific uncertainty, and (ii) the possibility for compulsory labelling with regard to sensitive non-nutritional properties of foodstuffs, need to be incorporated in international food trade regulations.
ACCESSION #
16004336

 

Related Articles

  • GMOs and Resolution of Conflicts Under the WTO. Candeira, Alejandro Lago; Cañellas, Anselmo Martínez; Recuerda, Miguel Á.; García, Enrique Alonso; Botija, Fernando González; Peralta, Pedro Díaz; Ghisleri, Lucia Roda; Martínez-Larrañaga, María Rosa; Anadón, Arturo // European Food & Feed Law Review;2009, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p282 

    The use of different standards and approaches for the assessment, management and communication of risk analysis in general, and in particular in foodstuffs, has important trade consequences. That is so noticeable that an organization outside the field of regulating food safety, the World Trade...

  • The European Communities Biotech Dispute: How the WTO Fails to Consider Cultural Factors in the Genetically Modified Food Debate. Zurek, Laylah // Texas International Law Journal;Spring2007, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p345 

    The article focuses on how the World Trade Organization (WTO) fails to consider cultural factors in the genetically modified food debate. In 2003, the U.S. joined by Canada and Argentina brought a claim to the WTO that the European Communities' strict regulation of genetically modified foods...

  • GMO BULLIES. Dobbin, Murray; Gould, Ellen // Alive: Canada's Natural Health & Wellness Magazine;Aug2008, Issue 310, p60 

    The article discusses issues related to genetically modified foods in Canada. It examines the international trade agreements which are believed to deprive the citizens of their right to select the kinds of food grown and sold in the country. It highlights the decision of the World Trade...

  • New GM row threatens world trade agreement. Pendrous, Rick // Food Manufacture;Sep2003, Vol. 78 Issue 9, p14 

    Reports that the dispute between Europe and the U.S. over genetically modified foods could yet prevent consensus at the World Trade Organization conference in Cancún, Mexico on September 10–14, 2003, despite the two trading blocs reaching agreement on other major agricultural issues. ...

  • WTO Kills European GMO Moratorium.  // Environmental Health Perspectives;Aug2006, Vol. 114 Issue 8, pA463 

    The article reports on the decision of the World Trade Organization in May 2006 that the European Union moratorium on genetically modified foods was illegal. The United States, Canada, and Argentina, world’s biggest producers of genetically modified (GM) foods brought up the case. The...

  • Trans-Atlantic Food Fight. Feffer, John // American Prospect;May2003, Vol. 14 Issue 5, p35 

    Deals with the trade disagreement between the European Union and the U.S. over the sale of genetically modified (GM) crops and foods from the U.S. to European markets. Food labeling regulation implemented by the European Union against GM foods; Reaction of the U.S. to the move of the European...

  • In India, The Humble Eggplant Mainly Featured In Dinner-table Conversations That Measured The.  // CruiseGuide;12/7/2009, p2 

    The article offers information on debates regarding the potential health hazards posed by the genetically modified (GM) strain of eggplant heads in India. It states that the food crop called Bt brinjal is cleared by the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee as safe for human consumption....

  • Scientific perspectives on regulating the safety of genetically modified foods. Gasson, Michael; Burke, Derek; Gasson, M; Burke, D // Nature Reviews Genetics;Mar2001, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p217 

    Regulation is often seen as the dull end of science. The recent storm over the introduction of genetically modified foods and the calls to regulate their consumption have had a negative effect on development of the science. Assuring the safety of genetically modified foods might raise questions...

  • Message on a bottle. Ennen, Steve // Food Processing (00156523);Dec2003, Vol. 64 Issue 12, p10 

    Provides an overview of the articles related to foods published in the magazine "Food Processing." Issue of labeling in the industry; Importance of food safety; Discussion on genetically modified foods.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics