TITLE

THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION TO CHANGE SENATE RULES AND PROCEDURES: A MAJORITARIAN MEANS TO OVER COME THE FILIBUSTER

AUTHOR(S)
Gold, Martin B.; Gupta, Dimple
PUB. DATE
September 2004
SOURCE
Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2004, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p205
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Sets forth the history of the constitutional option in the U.S. Overview of the Senate rules governing debate; History of the filibuster; Use of the constitutional option as a response to the filibuster.
ACCESSION #
15864606

 

Related Articles

  • Argument and Visual Structuring in the 1984 Mondale-Reagan Debates: The Medium's Influence on the Perception of Clash. Morello, John T. // Western Journal of Speech Communication: WJSC;Fall1988, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p277 

    An analysis of the visual and verbal content of the 1984 televised debates between Walter Mondale and Ronald Reagan reveals that the visual structuring of candidate statements of clash altered the verbal record of clash in two ways. First, the visual presentation misrepresented the amount of...

  • House of Lords.  // EPM Weekly Bulletin;1/19/2004, Issue 159, p3 

    The article focuses on various debates taken up in the House of Lords in Great Britain, as of January 2004. On Thursday 12 February, 2004, the House of Lords will rise for its half-term break and return on Monday 23 February, 2004. On Thursday 8 April, 2004, the House of Lords will rise for the...

  • Filibusters and Cloture.  // Congressional Digest;May2005, Vol. 84 Issue 5, p131 

    The article focuses on filibusters and cloture rules governing extended debate in the Senate. The filibuster is widely viewed as one of the Senate's most distinctive procedural features. Today, the term is most often used to refer to Senators holding the floor in extended debate. More generally,...

  • A Communication. Cohen, Benjamin V.; Rauh Jr., Joseph L. // New Republic;3/6/71, Vol. 164 Issue 10, p30 

    Focuses on the parliamentary practice of filibustering in the U.S. Rules regarding the use of filibusters in the House of Representatives; Overview of the various purposes of filibustering; Advantages and disadvantages; Application of filibustering in the passage of a bill related to civil rights.

  • Welsh Assembly.  // EPM Weekly Bulletin;1/19/2004, Issue 159, p5 

    The article focuses on various debates taken up in the Welsh legislative assembly, as of January 2004. On Tuesday, 13 January, the debate was on Assembly Learning Grants, led by the parliamentarian, Michael German. Parliamentarian, Jane Davidson, made a statement on the Westminster Higher...

  • Should Debate in the Senate Be Further Limited? Pro. Lenroot, Irvine L. // Congressional Digest;Nov26, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p312 

    The article presents views of the author regarding the limitation of debate in the U.S. Senate. Senators have the right to filibuster and they have the power to do so under present rules of the Senate, but the majority has a responsibility and the country, well understands that under rules of...

  • Should Debate in the Senate be Further Limited? Con. Norris, George W. // Congressional Digest;Nov26, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p308 

    The article presents views of the author on whether debate in the U.S. Senate be further limited. The filibuster is an extraordinary procedure. It is illogical and conditions should be so changed that it will not be used or attempted. A study of the procedure of the Senate will demonstrate that...

  • Should Debate in the Senate be Further Limited? Con. Mayfield, Earle B. // Congressional Digest;Nov26, Vol. 5 Issue 11, p309 

    The article presents views of the author on whether debate in the U.S. Senate be further limited. It is possible for one U.S. Senator or a small number of Senators to obstruct legislation by filibuster when the Senate is about to adjourn sine die, but it is unfair to create the impression that...

  • The Scottish Parliament.  // EPM Weekly Bulletin;1/19/2004, Issue 159, p4 

    The article focuses on various debates taken up in the Scottish parliament, as of January 2004. On Thursday 15 January 2004, the education bill was debated by the parliamentarian, Ian Smith with the question that what would be the effects of the Westminster Higher Education Bill on Scottish...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics