TITLE

GLAD files suit against Reilly over anti-gay referendum

AUTHOR(S)
Kiritsy, Laura
PUB. DATE
October 2001
SOURCE
Bay Windows;10/11/2001, pN.PAG
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on a lawsuit filed by Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD) on October 3, 2001 asking the Supreme Judicial Court to overturn Attorney General Thomas Reilly's decision to certify anti-gay constitutional amendments. Aim of the Protection of Marriage amendments; Argument presented by GLAD about the amendments; Comments by Barbara Cox of the California Western School of Law on the amendments.
ACCESSION #
15834158

 

Related Articles

  • Oregon Appeals Court Rejects Challenge to Marriage Amendment. Leonard, Arthur S. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Jun2008, p105 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the Marion County Circuit Court rejected a challenge to the 2004 Ballot Measure 36 which states that only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be legally recognized as a marriage. Based on the plaintiffs' arguments Measure 36 was not properly...

  • Across the Nation.  // Advocate;6/10/2003, Issue 891, p15 

    Presents news briefs related to gays in the U.S. as of June 10, 2003. Dismissal of a lawsuit challenging Indiana's ban on recognizing same-sex unions; Passage of legislation to tighten Texas' defense of marriage law; Reintroduction of a Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act in the U.S. Senate.

  • The Litigation to Redefine Marriage: Equality and Social Meaning. Duncan, William C. // BYU Journal of Public Law;2004, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p623 

    Studies same-sex marriage litigation in the U.S. Changes in the nature of litigation; Waves of cases attempting to redefine marriage; Future of claims for same-sex marriage; Cases which led to state constitutional amendments and the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.

  • Same-sex marriage critics sue Mass. lawmakers.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/21/2006, Issue 991, p26 

    The article reports that members of the Voteonmarriage.org who support a measure to ban same-sex marriage has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court against 109 Massachusetts lawmakers who blocked a final vote on the proposed constitutional amendment. The lawsuit argues that the lawmakers...

  • Suit filed to overturn Calif. gay marriage ban. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;11/10/2008, Vol. 42 Issue 45, p25 

    The article focuses on suit filed to overturn gay marriage ban in California. Opponents of a California ballot measure that would end same-sex marriage filed a lawsuit asking the state Supreme Court to invalidate the proposed constitutional amendment. Proposition 8, an amendment to California's...

  • Ohio Appeals Court Says State Marriage Amendment Narrows Application of Domestic Violence Law. Uselton, Ruth // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Jun2006, p105 

    The article focuses on the court case State v. Shaffer, 2006 WL 1459769, which involved a conviction of domestic violence where a man assaulted his girlfriend in their shared home. In a decision by the Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District, the conviction was reversed based on the court's...

  • Federal lawsuit challenges state's ban on same-sex marriage.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;11/11/2004, Issue 881, p27 

    Reports that four women have filed a federal lawsuit challenging a constitutional amendment passed by voters that bans same-sex marriage in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Aim to challenge the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act; Denial of rights and privileges of other citizens within the...

  • Ohio Appeals Court Rejects Application of DOMA Amendment to Domestic Violence Case. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Jul2005, p142 

    The article presents information on the court case State of Ohio vs. Newell, 2005 WL 1364937, 2005 Ohio 2848. A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals of Ohio, 5th District, has rejected the argument that passage of a state constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage precludes the state...

  • Does Marriage Matter? Buckley, Jr., William F. // National Review;12/22/2003, Vol. 55 Issue 24, p59 

    The article presents the author's comments on the controversy surrounding the decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in favor of same-sex marriage. The author explores reasons why both the Republicans and the Democrats have been reluctant to call for a constitutional amendment outlawing gay...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics