The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction

Peres Bota, Daliana; Melot, Christian; Lopes Ferreira, Flavio; Nguyen Ba, Vinh; Vincent, Jean-Louis
November 2002
Intensive Care Medicine;Nov2002, Vol. 28 Issue 11, p1619
Academic Journal
Objective. To compare outcome prediction using the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), two of the systems most commonly used to evaluate organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU). Design. Prospective, observational study. Setting. Thirty-one-bed, university hospital ICU. Patients and participants. Nine hundred forty-nine ICU patients. Measurements and results. The MODS and the SOFA score were calculated on admission and every 48 h until ICU discharge. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was calculated on admission. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were used to compare initial, 48 h, 96 h, maximum and final scores. Of the 949 patients, 277 died (mortality rate 29.1%). Shock was observed in 329 patients (mortality rate 55.3%). There were no significant differences between the two scores in terms of mortality prediction. Outcome prediction of the APACHE II score was similar to the initial MODS and SOFA score in all patients, and slightly worse in patients with shock. Using the scores' cardiovascular components (CV), outcome prediction was better for the SOFA score at all time intervals (initial AUROC SOFA CV 0.750 vs MODS CV 0.694, p<0.01; 48 h AUROC SOFA CV 0.732 vs MODS CV 0.675, p<0.01; and final AUROC SOFA CV 0.781 vs MODS CV 0.674, p<0.01). The same tendency was observed in patients with shock. There were no significant differences in outcome prediction for the other five organ systems. Conclusions. MODS and SOFA are reliable outcome predictors. Cardiovascular dysfunction is better related to outcome with the SOFA score than with the MODS.


Related Articles

  • SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Moreno, Rui; Metnitz, Philipp; Almeida, Eduardo; Jordan, Barbara; Bauer, Peter; Campos, Ricardo; Iapichino, Gaetano; Edbrooke, David; Capuzzo, Maurizia; Le Gall, Jean-Roger // Intensive Care Medicine;Oct2005, Vol. 31 Issue 10, p1345 

    Objective: To develop a model to assess severity of illness and predict vital status at hospital discharge based on ICU admission data. Design: Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study. Patients and setting: A total of 16,784 patients consecutively admitted to 303 intensive care units...

  • Analyzing the impact of long-term patients on ICU bed utilization. Weissman, Charles // Intensive Care Medicine;Sep2000, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p1319 

    Objective: To establish ways of defining long-term ICU patients and to develop methods of quantifying their impact on bed utilization. Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected sample data. Setting: Two university hospital adult surgical ICUs. Patients: 6588 consecutive patients...

  • Deciding intensive care unit-admission for critically ill cancer patients. Thiery, Guillaume; Darmon, Michael; Azoulay, Elie // Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine;Jan-Mar2007, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p12 

    Over the last 15 years, the management of critically ill cancer patients requiring intensive care unit admission has substantially changed. High mortality rates (75–85%) were reported 10–20 years ago in cancer patients requiring life sustaining treatments. Because of these high...

  • Prognostic factors in cancer patients in the intensive care unit. Soares, Márcio; Salluh, Jorge I. F. // Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine;Jan-Mar2007, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p19 

    Intensive care has become important for the treatment of patients with cancer. However, the prognosis of these patients is considered poor a priori and decisions to admit a patient with cancer to the intensive care unit (ICU) are still source of controversy between oncologists and intensivists....

  • Waiting for the break of dawn?: The effects of discharge time, discharge TISS scores and discharge facility on hospital mortality after intensive care. Beck, Dieter H.; McQuillan, Peter; Smith, Gary B. // Intensive Care Medicine;Sep2002, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p1287 

    Objective. To assess the effects of discharge Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) scores, discharge time and type of discharge facility on ultimate hospital mortality after intensive care. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. General intensive care unit (ICU) in a district...

  • Case-mix-adjusted length of stay and mortality in 23 Finnish ICUs. Niskanen, Minna; Reinikainen, Matti; Pettilä, Ville // Intensive Care Medicine;Jun2009, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p1060 

    To create a tool for benchmarking intensive care units (ICUs) with respect to case-mix adjusted length of stay (LOS) and to study the association between clinical and economic measures of ICU performance. Observational cohort study. Twenty-three ICUs in Finland. A total of 80,854 consecutive ICU...

  • The effects of ICU admission and discharge times on mortality in Finland. Uusaro, Ari; Kari, Aarno; Ruokonen, Esko // Intensive Care Medicine;Dec2003, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p2144 

    Objective: Hospital mortality increases if acutely ill patients are admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays. Night discharges may increase mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients but the effect of ICU admission time on mortality is not known. We studied...

  • Admission Source to the Medical Intensive Care Unit Predicts Hospital Death Independent of APACHE II Score. Escarce, Jose J.; Kelley, Mark A. // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;11/14/90, Vol. 264 Issue 18, p2389 

    Details a study which examined if the source of admission to the medical intensive care unit is associated with hospital death independent of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Clinical characteristics of the study population; Methodology...

  • Health-related quality of life as a prognostic factor of survival in critically ill patients. Iribarren-Diarasarri, Sebastián; Aizpuru-Barandiaran, Felipe; Muñoz-Martínez, Tomás; Loma-Osorio, Ángel; Hernández-López, Marianela; Ruiz-Zorrilla, José; Castillo-Arenal, Carlos; Dudagoitia-Otaolea, Juan; Martínez-Alutiz, Sergio; Vinuesa-Lozano, Cristina // Intensive Care Medicine;May2009, Vol. 35 Issue 5, p833 

    To evaluate whether health-related quality of life prior to admission into an intensive care unit (ICU) is a prognostic factor of hospital and 1 year mortality. Prospective cohort study. Fourteen-bed medical–surgical ICU. A total of 377 patients admitted to the ICU for more than 24 h with...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics