Insight's Right to Sue City Is Upheld

Haugsted, Linda
January 2005
Multichannel News;1/17/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p16
Reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on December 29, 2004 that Insight Communications Co. did not violate antitrust laws against an overbuilder in Louisville, Kentucky. Rights of Insight under the cable franchise of the city; Contents of the franchise of Knology Inc.; Details of the ruling.


Related Articles

  • Ohio Franchise Tax Investment Credit Declared Unconstitutional. Gall, Maryann B. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to declare the franchise tax investment credit in Ohio as unconstitutional. The franchise tax credit violated the Commerce Clause of the constitution. In the Cuno versus DaimlerChrysler Inc. case, the court...

  • Constitutional challenge to Kentucky's telecom tax rejected.  // Sales & Use Tax Alert;6/15/2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p2 

    The article focuses on the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on the case DirecTV v. Treesh. In this case, satellite companies that provide multichannel video programming challenged Kentucky's telecommunications tax system, claiming that the prohibition against local...

  • Township not Responsible for Store Employee's Death. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Jun2006, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p46 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals involving a case in Michigan regarding the immunity of police officers to a complaint which is based on violation of due process. The court held that a township is not liable without constitutional violation. It cited two exceptions...

  • Transfer to More Demanding Job is Not an Adverse Job Action. Littrell, Amy W. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q4, p1 

    This article focuses on a ruling by the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on the court case, White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., stating that a transfer to a more demanding job is not an adverse job action. Facts of the case are presented. The court also held that the...

  • Court Affirms Denial of Disability Benefits.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p53 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholds a disability benefits determination under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review. The plaintiff pursued administrative appeals of the decision and the claims administrator and the defendant plan...

  • Court Awards Preliminary Injunction to Halt Retiree Benefit Changes.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p62 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed that the district court's award of preliminary injunctive relief related to the changes to retirees' health care benefits. The court notes that it need to review the district court's grant of a preliminary...

  • Ohio Court of Appeals Rejects Claim that Mailing of Notice of Appeal Satisfies Mandatory Appeal Requirements. Shambaugh, Phyllis J. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q1, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Sixth District Court of Appeals in Lucas County to reject a taxpayer's claim that the timely mailing of a notice to appeal to the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals satisfies the mandatory appeal requirements of RC 5717.01. Long standing Ohio precedent that...

  • Retiree's Pension Overpayments Won't Continue. Moore, Rebecca // Plan Advisor News;2013, p97 

    The article focuses on the decision of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that rejects the petition of retiree Virginia Stark to continue receiving pension overpayments caused by a computer system glitch on the side of Mars Pension Plan Committee.

  • Plethysmograph (PPG) Testing as a Condition of Supervised Release: Premature Expostulation.  // Correctional Mental Health Report;Mar2010, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p91 

    The article discusses the court ruling of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals which imposed the plethysmograph (PPG) testing of inmates before they can be released from prison. It states that an inmate must have PPG testing and the court noted that PPG testing will be useless for evaluation...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics