TITLE

N.J. Appeals Court Rules Underwriters Must Return Fees in Bribe Case

AUTHOR(S)
Cataldo, Athun L.; O'Brien, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
January 2005
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;1/10/2005, Vol. 351 Issue 32046, p33
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the ruling given by the New Jersey appeals court, which requires underwriters to return fees in bribe case. In a 3-to-0 decision issued on December 22, 2004, the Appellate Division of New Jersey Superior Court ruled that Essex County, New Jersey could recover fees from First Union Bank in connection with bond transactions from the late 1980s. The ruling awarded the county damages for a US$25 million deal in 1987 and for a US$49 million deal in 1989.
ACCESSION #
15642705

 

Related Articles

  • Suffolk jury awards record $80M. Mancini, Rosamaria // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);10/11/2002, Vol. 49 Issue 43, p1A 

    Reports that a jury in State Supreme Court in Suffolk County, New York awarded the family of a twin girl who born ten weeks premature and suffers from cerebral palsy. Amount awarded to the family; Prediction of Leon Lazer, a professor at Touro Law Center in New York about the award; Points on...

  • ABU DHABI COURT OF CASSATION JUDGMENT ON REPORTING EMPLOYESS WHO HAVE ABSCONDED.  // Law Update;5/20/2015, p1 

    The article focuses on a judgment by Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, United Arab Emirates confirming that employers have a duty to report absconded employees. Topics discussed include Court of First Instance's judgment of rejecting employee's claim for compensation; overturn of decision of Court...

  • INDEMNIZACI�N DEL DA�O MORAL EN EL DERECHO AMBIENTAL. Dei-Cas, B�rbara // Revista de Derecho (15105172);2009, Vol. 8 Issue 16, p125 

    No abstract available.

  • CONSTRUCTION--SUMMARY JUDGMENT-- SET OFF--LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--VIRGINIA.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec89, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p65 

    The article presents updates on court decisions on arbitration cases in the United States, compiled as of 1989. Summary judgment was erroneously granted because a material fact was genuinely in dispute. In addition, the general contractor was allowed to offset an un-liquidated debt from a...

  • Tuepker v State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.  // National Wetlands Newsletter;Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p19 

    The article reports that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed and reversed in part the decision of a lower court that an insurer need not reimburse a couple whose home was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina. The court agreed that the water damage exclusion in the...

  • SEVENTH CIRCUIT ADOPTS NEW TEST FOR REASONABLE COMPENSATION. Barton, Peter C. // CPA Journal;Jun2000, Vol. 70 Issue 6, p12 

    Reports that the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit has adopted the independent investor test for compensation. Details on the multifactor test used by the tax court; Reason for the adoption of the independent investor test.

  • Home Health: Nurse Gets Worker's Comp For Auto Accident.  // Legal Eagle Eye Newsletter for the Nursing Profession;Aug2005, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p4 

    Cites a Court of Appeals of North Carolina case involving a home health nurse's accident claims against his employer Caldwell Memorial Hospital. Facts of the case; Opinion of the court; Use of the traveling salesman exception to the general rule provision by the court, which ruled in favor of...

  • Do attitudes toward specific supreme court decisions matter? The impact of Webster and Texas v.... Grosskopf, Anke; Mondak, Jeffrey J. // Political Research Quarterly;Sep98, Vol. 51 Issue 3, p633 

    Focuses on the manner in which attitudes regarding specific Supreme Court decisions influence subsequent levels of confidence in the court. Analysis of the impact of the 1989 `Webster' abortion decisions and `Texas v. Johnson,' the flag-burning edict released immediately prior to `Webster';...

  • Delaying Justice: The Supreme Court's Decision to Hear Rearguments. Hoekstra, Valerie; Johnson, Timothy // Political Research Quarterly;Sep2003, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p351 

    Some of the Supreme Court's most famous cases�from Roe v. Wade (1973) to Brown v. Board of Education (1954)�have been decided only after being held over and argued a second time. While few cases take this path, scholars have offered no systematic account for why the Court would ever...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics