No Ethanol Needed: California Wins Reconsideration of its Request for an Oxygenate Waiver
- DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE V. EPA: TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF FEDERAL AGENCY POWER UNDER THE ESA. Bosse, Sherry L. // Environmental Law (00462276);Summer2006, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p1025
In August 2005, the Ninth Circuit reversed an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) decision to delegate National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting authority to the state of Arizona under the Clean Water Act (CWA) in Defenders of Wildlife v. EPA. The lead plaintiff,...
- EPA Broadens RCRA Definition of "Hazardous Waste" to Include Mixtures and Derivatives. Nickovich, Jim // Ecology Law Quarterly;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p781
Focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on an environmental case filed by the American Chemistry Council against the Environmental Protection Agency in 2004. Background of the case; Implications of the decision of the Court for the expansion of the...
- IN BRIEF. GARRETT, THEODORE L. // Trends (15339556);Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p8
The article offers information on judgments of several court cases of the U.S. In the Bankcorpsouth Bank case, the court dismissed bank's misrepresentation claims against companies which prepared environmental remediation plan. A court remanded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)...
- CASE SUMMARIES. // Environmental Law (00462276);Summer2006, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p907
The article presents case summaries related to Environment and Natural Resources decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals between March 2005 to 2006. These include the Ninth Circuit's decision not to apply the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act in ARC...
- "Poof!". Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2012, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p12
The article discusses the court case Mingo Logan Coal Co. v. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in March 2012. It notes that the federal district court has invoked the case as disparaging magical thinking behin the argument of EPA that the Clean Water Act authorizes EPA to make...
- USING ALASKA V. EPA TO UNMASK THE CLEAN AIR ACT. Bridges, Bonnie // Energy Law Journal;2004, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p431
Discusses the case Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Enforcement of the Clean Air Act in Alaska; Basis of the court in its decision; Analysis of the case.
- Judge Backs Industry Suit Against EPA Mining Actions. RICKMAN, JOHNATHAN // Energy Daily;1/20/2011, Issue 13, p3
This article reports that Judge Reggie Walton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled that the coal industry might prevail in litigation arguing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) exceeded its authority in several regulatory initiatives aimed at cracking own...
- PUMPS DUMPED TO PROTECT MISSISSIPPI WETLANDS. // National Wildlife (World Edition);Jun/Jul2011, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p46
The article reports a court ruling that upheld a decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to halt the construction of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Project, called the Yazoo Pumps Project.
- Opinion: Supremes Court Gives Landowners A Victory. Marshall, Troy // Beef Expert Blog;3/30/2012, p20
The author discusses the ruling issued by the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which involved home construction on alleged wetlands in Idaho.