TITLE

Jinks and its Implications for Federal Preemption of State Statutes of Limitations under CERCLA Section 309

AUTHOR(S)
Cho, Christin
PUB. DATE
August 2004
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p725
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the implications of the rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case between Jinks company and Richland County, Ohio for the limitations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in 2004. Overview of the court judgment; Details of the legislation; Criticisms on the constitutionality of the environmental act.
ACCESSION #
15590986

 

Related Articles

  • High Court Not In A State Of Denial. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p10 

    Discusses whether the U.S. Supreme Court will grant requests for reviews of environmental law cases in the U.S. Information on a pending decision of the Supreme Court for the case U.S. Environmental Protection Agency versus Sierra Club; Details of environmental law cases granted by the Supreme...

  • Stop the Beach Renourishment -- What Does It Mean? Lucero, Lora A. // State & Local Law News;Fall2010, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p4 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The court ruled that the state does not owe six beachfront property owners monetary compensation and the beach renourishment program of Florida is constitutional. It is...

  • States Carp Over Asian Carp Invasion. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p14 

    The article explores the court decision that serves as a reminder that the law of environmental protection is an important precept in the U.S. It highlights a situation in which the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago struggle to avoid an environmental catastrophe rooted in their own...

  • Environmentalism and the Supreme Court: A Cultural Analysis. Cannon, Jonathan // Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p363 

    This article offers a cultural interpretation of the decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court in environmental cases, analyzes some of its major environmental decisions of the last three decades in light of beliefs and values commonly associated with environmentalism. In doctrinally diverse cases,...

  • States seek CO2 reversal. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;3/13/2006, Vol. 11 Issue 24, p3 

    The article reports that several environmental groups and a dozen states are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a lower court ruling and force the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles. Massachusetts Attorney General Tom Reilly is leading...

  • Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Isolated Waters, Migratory Birds, Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation. Fitzgerald, Edward A. // Natural Resources Journal;Winter2003, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p11 

    Examines U.S. Supreme Court's analysis of the case Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the context of the conceptual framework of Chevron, U.S.A v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Analysis of the migratory bird rule in terms of the Court's commerce...

  • Navajo Nation vs. U.S. Forest Service.  // Native American Law Digest;Nov/Dec2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11/12, p23 

    The article reports on the resolution of the legal case of the Navajo Nation vs. the U.S. Forest Service. In the case the Navajo and other tribes had argued that the expansion of a ski area which had been approved by the forest service violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the National...

  • We the Corporations of the United States…. Schweiger, Larry J. // National Wildlife (World Edition);Apr/May2010, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p6 

    The article discusses the impact that a 2010 decision from the U.S. Supreme Court to redefine the word people in the U.S. Constitution and extend First Amendment protections to corporations will have on efforts to protect the environment. In the article the author offers his opinions on the...

  • Supreme Court rules EPA can regulate carbon emissions.  // Mining Engineering;May2007, Vol. 59 Issue 5, p6 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to give the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate carbon emissions in motor vehicles. The Court claims that the decision was based on the Clean Air Act (CAA). It emphasized that EPA has no reasoned...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics