TITLE

Lockheed Martin and California's Limits on Class Treatment for Medical Monitoring Claims

AUTHOR(S)
Reblitz-Richardson, Beko
PUB. DATE
August 2004
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p615
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court rejected certification for a proposed medical monitoring class, but declined to set a per se bar against class treatment of such claims. The court held that individual issues predominated because the class members had not provided substantial evidence that they could resolve dosage issues with common proof. In rejecting certification, the court improperly focused on the substantive merits of the case and raised a manageability concern for future classes of medical monitoring claimants. Although the decision expressly allows for class treatment of medical monitoring claims under certain circumstances, it limits class-wide adjudication of environmental pollution and chemical exposure claims because it requires excessive scrutiny of the merits for certification.
ACCESSION #
15590941

 

Related Articles

  • LEGAL UPDATE.  // Benefits Quarterly;2006 Second Quarter, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p46 

    The article offers information on judgments on various employee benefits cases in the U.S. 2004): A decision to suspend a retiree's pension benefits and to recoup benefits already paid was not an unlawful termination under Employee Retirement Income Security Act where the retiree owned and...

  • Doctors Disagree.  // New Republic;8/9/39, Vol. 100 Issue 1288, p5 

    Focuses on the decision of the District of Columbia court which throws out the government's indictment of the American Medical Association charging illegal interference with Group Health Association of Washington should not and will not end the case. Reduction Demand of Group Health Association...

  • Litigation.  // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;9/20/94, Vol. 68 Issue 18, p14 

    Reports on litigations related to health care. Appeal for the decision in Looney versus Stephen D. Herman, M.D., et al.; Geisinger's System's loss in its second bid to be declared as tax exempt.

  • RULING MAY TRAMPLE WHISTLEBLOWER SUITS.  // H&HN: Hospitals & Health Networks;11/20/97, Vol. 71 Issue 22, p51 

    Focuses on a federal ruling affecting whistleblowers' filing of Medicare and Medicaid fraud lawsuits against health providers in the United States. Facts on the implementation of whistleblower suits; Decision of U.S. courts to uphold the law.

  • DEBILITATING ALEXANDER V. CHOATE: "MEANINGFUL ACCESS" TO HEALTH CARE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. Francis, Leslie Pickering; Silvers, Anita // Fordham Urban Law Journal;Jun2008, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p447 

    In this article, the authors develop a strategy for addressing and circumscribing the influence of the U.S. court case Alexander v. Choate and debilitating its effects. The authors analyze in detail the court's decision in the case. They then establish how a wide array of cases, both in and out...

  • Karen Quinlan.  // National Review;4/30/1976, Vol. 28 Issue 15, p438 

    This article reports on the ruling of the New Jersey Supreme Court that the life support system may be withdrawn from coma patient Karen Anne Quinlan without civil or criminal liability in 1976. The author argues that the development of advanced transplant techniques may have an effect on one's...

  • Selected recent court decisions.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1998, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p499 

    Lists several recent court decisions in various lawsuits filed in the United States as of December 1998. Includes the cases `United States versus Bajakaijan'; `Kottle versus Northwest Kidney Centers'; `Arrington versus Wong.'

  • Opinion of the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2006, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p188 

    An excerpt from the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in "Salim Ahmed Hamdan v. Donald Rumsfeld" is presented.

  • Before the Court.  // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2008, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p40 

    An excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court's April 16, 2008 decision in the case Larry Begay v. United States is presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics