TITLE

Entrenching the Status Quo: The Ninth Circuit Uses Preemption Doctrines to Interpret CERCLA as Setting a Ceiling for Local Regulation of Environmental Problems

AUTHOR(S)
Barnhill, Alexandra Manchik
PUB. DATE
August 2004
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2004, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p487
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The inadequacies of the federal and state hazardous waste cleanup statutes are almost as renowned as the high-profile incidents of pollution that spurred those laws' creation. Fireman's Fund v. City of Lodi gave the Ninth Circuit the chance to review a community's attempt to address those deficiencies. In that case, when its sole source of drinking water was contaminated, the City of Lodi supplemented federal and state law with a town ordinance that allowed more stringent cleanup. The plaintiff insurance companies, who were the target of the ordinance, challenged the ordinance on preemption grounds. Although the Ninth Circuit acknowledged municipalities' police powers to protect their community by holding that federal and state laws do not preempt the field, it limited that holding by determining that local enactments that enforce a more stringent cleanup standard are invalid because they conflict with the existing regulations' goals. This Note asserts three arguments suggesting that the Ninth Circuit's conflict preemption holding was erroneous: first, the ruling is inconsistent with CERCLA; second, it violates Supreme Court precedent; and third, it is contrary to the court's own rationale. The Note concludes that the Fireman's Fund ruling contravenes Congress's intent to allow lower levels of government to improve upon existing regulations. Instead, the decision entrenches the status quo by restricting municipalities' ability to protect their residents' health and safety; under Fireman's Fund, local legislation can only require polluters to clean up contamination to levels at or below those required by federal and state law, which are publicly recognized as inadequate.
ACCESSION #
15590916

 

Related Articles

  • Drinking water: Is it safe to soften the rules?  // Consumer Reports;Dec95, Vol. 60 Issue 12, p757 

    Focuses on the possible negative effects of the proposed changes in the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. Prohibitive cost of monitoring and reporting contaminant limits; More lenient rules; Overreaction on the part of Congress.

  • SDWA reauthorization faces showdown in House. Crow, Patrick // WaterWorld;May96, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p6 

    Reports on the US Congress' efforts to reauthorize the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). House Commerce Committee's version of the bill; Bill's provisions.

  • Ballast Laws May Force Federal Hand. Pendergrass, John // Environmental Forum;Nov/Dec2006, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p8 

    This article discusses the regulation of ballast water discharges in the shipping industry to control the introduction of invasive species. According to the author, California and Michigan have enacted several laws requiring pre-treatment and permitting of ballast water and the U. S. Congress...

  • CAPITAL BRIEFS.  // Waste News;11/21/2005, Vol. 11 Issue 15, p10 

    This article presents a summary of recent developments in the U.S. federal and state environmental legislation and regulation. The U.S. House Bill 4176 provides that, beginning on the effective date of this amendatory act and through June 30, 2012, hybrid vehicles and components for hybrid...

  • Water quality in the distribution system: A review. Spencer, Catherine // Journal: American Water Works Association;Jul2012, Vol. 104 Issue 7, p48 

    The article focuses on the water quality issues in a water distribution system in terms of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). It cites the major aspects of water quality that should be considered in distribution systems such as its quality at point of entry to systems and maintenance practices....

  • Bipartisan bill rolls toward House vote. Fairley, Peter // Chemical Week;6/19/1996, Vol. 158 Issue 24, p17 

    Reports on the prospects for the passage of a Safe Drinking Water Act reform bill in the US House. Features of the bill; Two provisions opposed in the bill opposed by the chemical industry.

  • EPA would boost funds and reduce regulations.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;9/20/93, Vol. 231 Issue 12, p19 

    Reports on the status of revisions to the Safe Drinking Water Act in Congress. Presentation of recommendations by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Mandating of standards for compliance by local utilities.

  • Provision of safe domestic water for the promotion and protection of public health: a case study of the city of Beirut, Lebanon. Korfali, Samira Ibrahim; Jurdi, Mey // Environmental Geochemistry & Health;Jun2009, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p283 

    Securing adequate safe drinking water and proper sanitation is a major challenge facing the developing world. The “Water for Life Decade” emphasizes the importance of upgrading national water quality and sanitation services. This study assessed the domestic water profile in the city...

  • DRINKING WATER GUIDANCE REVISED.  // ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Nov2009, Issue 418, p37 

    The article reports on the revision by the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) of its guidance to water companies regarding the pollution of tap water supplies by perfluorooctanyl sulphonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The origin of these perfluorinated compounds are described along...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics