- Peer Review. Fabry, Dave // Audiology Today;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p14
The article offers the author's insights on the peer review process as a way to evaluate the papers submitted to archival journals such as "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology" and "Audiology Today."
- Medical Publishing: The Future. Dorion, Dominique // Journal of Otolaryngology;May2001 Supplement 1, Vol. 30, p47
Discusses the future of the publication of clinical papers. Use of electronic communication; Globalization of information posting and exchange; Benefits of using repositories for scientific community; Changes in peer review process.
- Peer review not exactly 'golden' Gasparro, Frank // Dermatology Times;Apr2002, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p7
Focuses on the use of peer review in the publication of medical journals. Reliability of the peer review process; Manipulation of statistic and review papers; Comment of dermatologist Norman Levine on the effectiveness of peer review.
- Putting the 'Peer' in Peer-reviewed Articles. KOWALCZYK, NINA // ASRT Scanner;Oct/Nov2010, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p54
The article focuses on volunteerism in the American Society of Radiologic Technologists (ASRT) review boards. The author pointed out that this increases the professionalism among RTs by expanding their professional knowledge base. According to the author the major goal of the ASRT editorial...
- Editor's Note. // Environmental Health Perspectives;Feb2011, Vol. 119 Issue 2, pA59
No abstract available.
- The role of the researcher as a producer and reviewer of scientific papers. Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci // Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem (RLAE);Mar/Apr2012, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p215
No abstract available.
- The Predator and Prey of Publishing Research. Longyhore, Daniel; Zagar, Brenda // American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education;2015, Vol. 79 Issue 8, p1
A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences" by John D. Bowman in the previous issue.
- Peer review system must be overhauled and improved. O'Dowd, Adrian // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;8/6/2011, Vol. 343 Issue 7818, p278
The article reports on the radical overhaul needed by the peer review system used by many medical journals in Great Britain. It notes the "Peer Review in Scientific Publications" report which recommends that publishers, research funders and the users of research output should work together to...
- FROM THE EDITORS. Barkema, Harry // Academy of Management Journal;Aug2001, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p615
In this article the author discusses why management researchers around the globe should want to be published in the "Academy of Management Journal." He examines the growing international community that reads the journal and notes that it is seen as one of the top management journals in the...