TITLE

Wyoming Environmentalists Urge Leveraging IRBs for Cleaner Coal Plant

AUTHOR(S)
Kelemen, Jasmina
PUB. DATE
December 2004
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;12/30/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32040, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that two Wyoming environmental conservation groups are urging the state's governor to not allocate industrial revenue bonds for a local power plant unless construction plans incorporate a cleaner-coal burning design. The Wyoming chapter of the Sierra Club and the Wyoming Conservation Voters have distributed close to 2,000 postcards to their members to sign and send to governor Dave Freudenthal urging him to use the bond allocation as leverage to get North American Power Group to alter its plan for the Two Elk power plant near Wright, Wyoming.
ACCESSION #
15509735

 

Related Articles

  • Springfield Power Plant. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;3/31/2004, Vol. 347 Issue 31853, p43 

    Reports that voters of Springfield, Missouri will be asked to decide on whether to approve a bond that will finance a coal-fired power plant. Environmental groups opposing the project.

  • Carbon Emission Restrictions Proposed. Salmon, Stephanie; Hannapel, Jeff; Richter, Christian // Modern Casting;Jun2012, Vol. 102 Issue 6, p15 

    The article reports on the rules proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 27, 2012 under the Clean Air Act that would limit carbon pollution from coal-burning power plants and could mean higher energy prices for metalcasters.

  • EPA RULES FOR NONCONSTRUCTION-GRADE COAL ASH APPEAR SWEEPING.  // Rock Products;May/Jun2010 Cement Americas Suplmnt, p7 

    The article reports on the opening of a 90-day comment period by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for proposed rules on the disposal and management of ash and residue from coal-fired power plants.

  • A powerful uncertainty reigns. McGowan, Elizabeth // Waste News;9/11/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 10, p3 

    The article reports that the power community of the U.S. will be angst over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, if it sets carbon dioxide emission limits on coal-fired electrical generation plants. Studies have depicted that the coal-fired power plants are the single largest source of...

  • The GreenRoom. Young, Ben // Georgia Trend;Dec2006, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p11 

    The article discusses developments concerning the environment in Georgia as of December 2006. LS Power Associates has submitted a proposal to the Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division to build and operate a coal-fired power plant in Early County at the Southwestern...

  • Coal-fired power plants--science, technology and environmental policy issues. Jain, Ravi // Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy;Apr2004, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p73 

    Focuses on science, technology and environmental policy issues associated with the operation of coal-fired power plants in the U.S. Overview of environmental lawsuits involving federal agencies and state and regional groups; Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency of such power...

  • DOSSIER: AIR, LAND, AND SEA.  // American Prospect;Mar2005, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p7 

    Presents data and statistics related to environment protection in the U.S. as of March 2005. Estimate on the volume of mercury released by chlorine plants every year; Percentage of women of childbearing age that have levels of mercury in their blood that could endanger their offspring;...

  • CLEAN AIR RULE CHANGE OK'S PLANT UPGRADES.  // Coal Age;Oct2003, Vol. 108 Issue 9, p9 

    Reports that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has changed its New Source Review program rules so that the owners of older, coal-fired power plants will no longer have to upgrade pollution controls when they overhaul their facilities. Remarks from EPA acting administrator Marianne...

  • At Last EPA Pulls Plug On NSR Bottleneck. Arnold, Frank S. // Environmental Forum;Sep/Oct2003, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p14 

    Focuses on the New Source Review rule imposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency against power plants and refineries. Features of the rule; Problems caused by the tendency of environmental regulators to assume full compliance with their rules; Effect of the rule on coal-fired power plants.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics