Discovery Prevails in Privacy Case

Haugsted, Linda
December 2004
Multichannel News;12/13/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 50, p14
Reports on the ruling of the California Supreme Court on the privacy case filed by Steve Gates against Discovery Communications Inc. Claims of Gates against Discovery Channel; Facts of the case; Decision of the court regarding the right of media to use information in the public record.


Related Articles

  • Prejudice Speaks from the Bench The Court's Decision in the Mooney-Billings Case. West, George P. // New Republic;7/23/30, Vol. 63 Issue 816, p282 

    Focuses on the decision of the California Supreme Court in the Mooney-Billings case related to murder. Facts of the case; Contention of the plaintiff; Basis of the court decision.

  • Plain Meaning of Termination "At Will" To Be Decided by California Supreme Court. Valenza, D. Gregory // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q1, p1 

    The article offers information on the Supreme Court case Dore v. Arnold Worldwide LLC, filed in California. The case concerns the plain meaning of the termination at will in employment. The allegations against the company are discussed. The decision of the court in the case is explained. The...

  • California Supreme Court Rejects Personal Liability for Supervisors in FEHA Retaliation Cases.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    The article discusses the court case Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership wherein the California Supreme Court rejected personal liability for supervisors in Fair Employment & Housing Act (FEHA) retaliation cases. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit alleging sexual orientation...

  • California Supreme Court delves into doctors' religious dilemma.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;6/29/2006, Issue 966, p14 

    The article reports that California Supreme Court corresponds with a decision agreeing that physicians can refuse medical service to patients who go against their religious beliefs. The case of Christine Brody and Douglas Fenton, Vista fertility doctors, was reviewed by the justices. Such...

  • Gay Marriage by Judicial Decree. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;5/24/2008, Vol. 40 Issue 20, p9 

    In this article, the author expresses his opinion on a decision by the California Supreme Court ordering the state to stop calling committed gay couples domestic partners and start calling them married. According to the author, he is happy for the many gays who rejoiced at the court's decision....

  • California Court Won't Hear Bond Challenge Appeal. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;6/22/2009, Vol. 368 Issue 33135, p4 

    The article reports on the decision by the California Supreme Court not to hear the appeal filed by Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety (TiPS) to a case which challenged California's ability to issue lease revenue bonds. The Supreme Court let stand the ruling of the appeals court and trial...

  • California Supreme Court: Voluntary Administrative Proceedings Toll Limitations Period under FEHA.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q4, Special section p1 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff's claims on statute of limitations under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) were incorrectly dismissed by the trial court. The California Supreme Court ordered for the return of the case to the trial court for further...

  • New Rules for Noncompete Provisions and Releases in California.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q3, following p2 

    The article reports on the new rules for noncompete provisions and releases in California. It notes that the ruling of the state Supreme Court regarding the case Edwards versus Arthur Andersen LLP strengthens the notion that limited noncompetition agreements cannot be enforced in the state. It...

  • Firms score win with adjuster overtime ruling. CENICEROS, ROBERTO // Business Insurance;1/2/2012, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p4 

    The article reports that California's Supreme Court ruled in favor of the firms and insurers by declaring that adjusters do administrative work which exempts their employers from laws that require the payment of overtime wages. The decision reverses the appellate court's findings. It is...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics