TITLE

R (on the application of Wall) v Brighton and Hove City Council

AUTHOR(S)
Dobson, Sally
PUB. DATE
November 2004
SOURCE
EG: Estates Gazette;11/13/2004, Issue 446, p150
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Provides information on the case R, on the application of Wall, versus Brighton and Hove City Council regarding town and country planning. Reason the claimant objected to the defendant Council's planning application for the construction of a block of flats on a site that adjoined the claimant's property; Rulings of the case.
ACCESSION #
15307813

 

Related Articles

  • Court Rejects Claim to a Constitutionally Protected View. Lawlor, James // Planning;Jun2007, Vol. 73 Issue 6, p50 

    The article reports on the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals on the case concerning the constitutionally protected property interest in a scenic view in Crested Butte, Colorado. The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled that a zoning code provision which requires that the Mount Crested Butte's...

  • R (on the application of Corus UK Ltd (t/a Orb Electrical Steels)) v Newport City Council. Dobson, Sally // EG: Estates Gazette;6/19/2010, Issue 1024, p117 

    The article discusses the court case R v. Newport City Council, wherein the claimant tried to overturn a permission granted to the defendant to use the defendant's land, adjacent to the claimant's property, as a place to relocate a gypsy family. The claimant argued that the defendant failed to...

  • Follow the proper procedure. Edwards, Martin; Martin, John // EG: Estates Gazette;5/29/2004, Issue 422, p138 

    Discusses the regulations for a local planning council in granting planning permissions in Great Britain. Decision of the court on the case R (on the application of Taylor) versus Maidstone Borough Council in England; Appearance of bias on the case R (on the application of Georgiou) versus...

  • Gtasshouse found in keeping with area.  // Planning (14672073);2/27/2009, Issue 1807, p21 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the appellant argues that it was unsustainable for them to suffer shortages of food and water due to local agricultural planning policies. It notes that the city council's economic development officer supported the project since it will secure grower's...

  • R (on the application of Garner and others) v Elmbridge Borough Council. Dobson, Sally // EG: Estates Gazette;2/12/2011, Issue 1106, p103 

    The article discusses the R. v. Elmbridge Borough Council case filed in the High Court of England and Wales (EWHC) in 2011. It involves the planning permission granted by the defendants for the Hampton Court redevelopment, noting that it had met essential technical requirements established by...

  • Skip removal justifies green belt homes.  // Planning (14672073);8/8/2008, Issue 1781, p24 

    The article reports on the ruling by an inspector that Surrey council has failed to give enough weight to the lawful use of a green belt site in rejecting a planning application for two bungalows in England. According to the inspector, a large part of the site was now utilized for the storage of...

  • Birmingham City Council v Keddie and another.  // EG: Estates Gazette;12/8/2012, Issue 1249, p71 

    The article discusses the court case Birmingham City Council vs. Keddie and another involving the leasehold valuation tribunal (LVT). It notes that the respondents held a lease of a flat in a block that is owned by the appellant landlords and were claiming that a service charge of 5,909.57...

  • Lies will not get around planning laws, court rules. Macrory, Richard // ENDS (Environmental Data Services);Jun2011, Issue 437, p65 

    The article comments on the decision of the Supreme Court on a lawsuit concerning the execution of laws against illegal development in Great Britain. The author notes that the court's decision held that deceit cannot be used to take advantage of planning rules on illegal developments. The case...

  • Case of the week. Cordran, Bob // Personnel Today;1/27/2009, p11 

    The article discusses the court case "Ali v Birmingham City Council." On April 25, 2007, Ali, who was employed by Birmingham City Council, handed in a letter of resignation due to "personal circumstances." On April 29, Ali e-mailed his manager saying he wished to return. Later on Ali claimed for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics