EIL Coverage: Action and Reaction

Dybdahl, David J.
September 1985
Risk Management (00355593);Sep85, Vol. 32 Issue 9, p54
Trade Publication
This article looks at why insurance companies have ceased to offer environmental impairment liability (EIL) insurance coverage in the U.S., as of December 1, 1985. As the insurance marketplace hardened, many carriers abandoned earthquake, product liability, and professional liability coverage, but almost no line of coverage suffered more than EIL insurance. As of May 1, 1985, only a handful of carriers continued to offer EIL insurance. Most blame the withdrawal of reinsurance capacity, but the real causes are much more complex. EIL involves many volatile social, legal, and political issues that are still being formulated by law makers and the courts. With the hardening of the insurance marketplace, most carriers do not have to depend on new and unproven product lines to provide them with desired premium growth. There might have been more insurance carrier participation in EIL coverage if past sales had been higher. Many potential buyers were not aware of the severe losses being paid and underestimated the significance of the ultimate loss exposure. Consequently, when insurers who were writing EIL coverage thoroughly explored the loss exposure, they developed premiums that risk managers thought were unrealistically high.


Related Articles

  • A&E under-reserving threat seen lessening. Howard, Lisa // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;07/20/98, Vol. 102 Issue 29, pS-8 

    Focuses on the threat of asbestos and environmental exposure to insurance and reinsurance companies in the United States. Comments on the manageability of the problem; Efforts of companies to boost their reserves; Effects of reserving to ultimate liabilities.

  • Insurers are ready for added pollution liability. Pruzin, Daniel // Best's Review;Feb2000, Vol. 100 Issue 10, p21 

    Reports that international insurers are expected to meet increased demand for pollution-damage coverage as a result of a global agreement on liability for hazardous-waste shipments. Protocols of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements on Hazardous Waste and Their...

  • Pollution probe cover rejected. Lenckus, Dave // Business Insurance;8/20/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 34, p6 

    Reports the effect of pollution investigation costs on liability insurers in Denver, Colorado. Rejection of the court on the court appeal of policyholder Union Pacific Railroad Co.; Litigation of the issue; Publication of the court ruling.

  • Pollution settlements pushed. Gayner, Neil // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;08/31/98, Vol. 102 Issue 35, p3 

    Focuses on the resistance among insurers in the London, England market to negotiate with pollution liability settlement policyholders in the United States. Scale of the country's pollution problem causing the resistance; Need for London insurers to adopt a more proactive settlement strategy.

  • EIL market remains friendly environment for insurance buyers. Wojcik, Joanne // Business Insurance;11/21/94, Vol. 28 Issue 47, p3 

    Reports that the environmental liability exposures market are still favorable for insurance buyers. Development of new products to meet needs of companies pollution risks; Comments from John Theis, vice president at Willis Corroon; Reasons for the lack of interest in the real estate portfolio...

  • Few carriers willing to brave the hazards of environmental market. Panko, Ron // Best's Review / Property-Casualty Insurance Edition;Apr96, Vol. 96 Issue 12, p50 

    Discusses the positive and negative aspects of environmental impairment liability insurance (EIL) to insurance companies. EIL as a potential growth market for insurers; Underdevelopment of the EIL insurance market; Insurance companies' reluctance to enter the market; Need for expertise, capital...

  • Environmental insurance revival...hallelujah! Lombino, Paul // Treasury & Risk Management;Nov/Dec94, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p49 

    Discusses environmental liability insurance. Reluctance of insurance companies to offer liability coverage; Possible legislation to ensure availability of pollution insurance; Reason behind increase in environmental liability coverage; Market potential for pollution insurance; Legal battles...

  • German EIL rates soften. Kirk, Don Lewis // Business Insurance;08/10/98, Vol. 32 Issue 32, p17 

    Discusses the change in rates and conditions set by German insurers for environmental impairment liability (EIL) insurance. When EIL insurance was introduced in Germany; Views of Stephan Jens, managing director of Bund Versicherter Unternehmen e. V, a German buyer's association; Reference to the...

  • Environmental Litigation and the Insurance Dilemma. Rich, Bradford W. // Risk Management (00355593);Dec85, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p34 

    The article deals with issues facing the U.S. insurance industry regarding environmental exposure coverage. Since June 1979, most insurers have included a pollution exclusion in their liability policies. This clause excluded all pollution exposures except discharge, dispersal, release or escape...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics