Australia set to unify defamation legislation

Westacott, Gemma
November 2004
Lawyer;11/22/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 45, p7
Trade Publication
Announces the agreement made by eight states and territories of Australia to support the development of new legislation. Proposal of a blueprint for defamation laws to be adopted to unify the differing systems; Assurance of truthful statements to be stated by people involved in cases.


Related Articles

  • Group Defamation and Individual Actions: A New Look at an Old Rule.  // California Law Review;Sep83, Vol. 71 Issue 5, p1532 

    Proposes the abolition of rules restricting defamation suits by group members. Overview of defamation law; Exceptions to the general defamation rule.

  • Loose tongue can lose car under new bill.  // Advocate;4/10/74, Issue 135, p5 

    Reports on a proposed defamation law in Delaware which makes injurious statements and epithets directed at certain persons a misdemeanor. Sponsor of the draft legislation; Prohibition of phrases based on sexual preference and race; Confiscation of vehicle when committing misdemeanor while driving.

  • Legal limits. Martin, Kingsley // New Statesman & Society;4/9/93, Vol. 6 Issue 247, p27 

    Presents a 1953 article on libel. Avoiding suits by writing nothing; Categories of libel threats; `The Law of Libel and Slander'; Need to employ a lawyer for law-related matters; Libel cases arising from proofreading mistakes; Defamation Act of 1952.

  • Foreword: The Sociological Tort of Defamation. Skolnick, Jerome H. // California Law Review;May86, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p677 

    Introduces a series of articles about the sociological tort of defamation which appeared in the May 1986 issue of the journal 'California Law Review.'

  • A Declaratory Judgment Alternative to Current Libel Law. Franklin, Marc A. // California Law Review;May86, Vol. 74 Issue 3, p809 

    Presents a statutory scheme as an alternative to the libel law implemented in the U.S. Factors that need to be considered in developing alternatives to libel law; Problems with the libel law enacted in the country; Role of retraction in judicial administration.

  • The material element in the basic form of the offense of abusive behavior. ROTARU, Mihaela // Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica;Jun2012, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p169 

    Legal rules are dynamic, meaning that they change depending on the evolution of the society at a certain time, in order to successfully meet the needs of regulation of social relations. The Criminal Code is no exception to this rule. Insult and slander have been decriminalized by the Law no....

  • Veggie libel could put reporters in a pickle. Corrigan, Don // St. Louis Journalism Review;Mar98, Vol. 28 Issue 204, p18 

    Gives information on the `vegie libel bill' which pertains to penalties being impose against persons who spread false and defamatory statements about a farm producer and farm products, that law makers in Missouri want to get implemented. Reference made to the case of Oprah Winfrey;...

  • So--when did Goofy get elected?  // Organic Gardening (08973792);Jul/Aug94, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p20 

    Reports on the food disparagement bill which was passed by the Florida state senate. Farming slander; Right to sue anyone who calls Florida fruits and vegetables unfit for human consumption; Public utterance against the state's much-sprayed food crops; Opponents of the bill; Potential for...

  • Food for thought. Robins, Jon // Lawyer;9/6/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 34, p19 

    The article reports that the European Court of Human Rights is set to decide whether multinationals should be able to sue individuals for libel. It has now been 14 years since the fast food giant McDonald's first served libel writs against the two self-styled anarchists for handing out leaflets...


Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics