TITLE

The Supreme Court Rules!

PUB. DATE
January 1936
SOURCE
New Republic;1/15/36, Vol. 85 Issue 1102, p269
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the United States Supreme Court's ruling that the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was unconstitutional. View that the taxing power cannot be used to accomplish any object that lies outside the powers expressly granted to the federal government by the Constitution; Indication that it would be futile for Congress to try either to lay a tax which would permit paying the farmers or to do anything about the agricultural problem.
ACCESSION #
15028509

 

Related Articles

  • Washington Notes.  // New Republic;1/30/35, Vol. 81 Issue 1052, p330 

    Deals with the current political developments in the U.S. Assessment of the decision of the Supreme Court on the gold-clause case; Indications that the administration will not by any means have the clear sailing for its full program; Evaluation of the action of the Congress on the subject of...

  • NATIONAL HILL NOTES. Garrett, Garet // Saturday Evening Post;5/16/1936, Vol. 208 Issue 46, p12 

    Presents a report that discusses the reasons for the overthrowing of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) by the U.S. Supreme Court. Control of the federal government over agricultural production; Illegality of AAA for the government to enter into a contract with a farmer to control or regulate...

  • The Constitutional Issue.  // Saturday Evening Post;3/14/1936, Vol. 208 Issue 37, p26 

    Presents views and insights regarding the raging debates over Constitutional issues concerning taxation in the U.S. Views on those who oppose to the disposal of processing taxes by the Supreme Court in an effort to curtail its influence; Dismissal of the author on the popular belief that the...

  • THE COURT BILL.  // America;7/24/1937, Vol. 57 Issue 16, p373 

    The author reflects on the status of the proposed Court bill of the U.S. President. He stated that the bill to remodel the Supreme Court has been set-back by Hatton W. Sumners, chairman of the Judiciary Committee in July 13. He added that Sumners has emphasized that dictatorship, breakdown of...

  • No War Hysteria So Far. T.R.B. // New Republic;6/23/41, Vol. 104 Issue 25, p857 

    Presents information on prewar condition in the United States. Information on sinking the U.S. ships by Germany; Report on warning given by the U.S. Department of State to Germany; Announcement by the White House about appointments by the U.S. supreme Court; Information on damaging consequences...

  • SUPERVISORY POWER MEETS THE HARMLESS ERROR RULE IN FEDERAL GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. Mitchells, Rebecca Ann // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Fall1988, Vol. 79 Issue 3, p1037 

    This article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court's subordination of the supervisory power doctrine to the harmless error rule in the case Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States, eliminates dismissal of indictment as a supervisory power thereby reducing a court's control over its own proceedings....

  • United States v. Butler (1936).  // Constitution & the Nation: The Regulatory State, 1890-1945;2003, Vol. 24, p116 

    The article focuses on the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court on the Agricultural Adjustment Act which attempt to persuade farmers to limit taxation. The court stated that the tax can only be sustained by ignoring the avowed purpose and operation of the act. In addition, the tax can...

  • THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSE IN CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL REVIEW. Massey, Calvin // South Carolina Law Review;Autumn2007, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p1 

    The article explores why the purpose of governmental action is sometimes highly relevant to judicial determination of its constitutional validity and other times completely irrelevant to judicial determination. It describes the relevance and irrelevance of governmental purpose and the use of...

  • Conditional Strategic Retreat: The Court's Concession in the 1935 Gold Clause Cases. Glick, David // Journal of Politics;Jul2009, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p800 

    Though forgotten by history, the 1935 Gold Clause cases concerning abrogation of gold-indexed bonds were instantly dubbed historical landmarks. Perry v. U.S., the case addressing federal bond contracts, should be remembered as an important instance of strategic judicial retreat. Expecting that...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics