Cable Wants To Be in FCC's VoIP Ruling

Hearn, Ted
November 2004
Multichannel News;11/1/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 44, p41
Reports on a campaign being done by the cable television industry in the U.S. regarding the ruling of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that would bar states from regulating a class of voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) providers. Background on the pre-emption protections given by the FCC to VoIP providers; Views of the cable industry regarding the exclusion of their VoIP services in the pre-emption; Technical differences between cable VoIP and VoIP services.


Related Articles

  • Random Notes. Maxwell, Paul // CableFAX Daily;2/13/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 29, p5 

    Comments on various issues in the cable industry in the U.S. in 2006. Coverage of the Olympics by cable television networks; Release of an a la carte study by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.

  • Why Cable TV Rates Are Going Up.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Dec2003, Vol. 86 Issue 12, p10 

    Reports on an increase in cable TV rate in the U.S. in 2002. Factors which contributed to the increase; Monthly rates according to the Federal Communications Commission; Approaches to addressing the rise in cable rates; Cost of local advertising.

  • It's All Politics.  // CableFAX Daily;3/16/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 51, p2 

    Reports on the politics in the cable television policy of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission in 2006.

  • FCC ponders must carry for DTV. McConnell, Chris // Broadcasting & Cable;04/07/97, Vol. 127 Issue 14, p32 

    Discusses the need for the US Federal Communications Commission to consider the must-carry law's implications for digital TV in the wake of the US Supreme Court's decision to uphold the law requiring cable carriage of all local broadcast signals. Consideration of the issue in a future...

  • Cable TV: Can Bidders Be Watchdogs?  // Columbia Journalism Review;Mar/Apr1972, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p33 

    This article looks at the impact of the arrival of cable TV in the U.S. not only on every radio and TV network and station, but also on newspapers. In the not-too-distant future, all newspapers will be transmitted through cable TV sets, and the publisher who does not have access to a cable...

  • THIS JUST IN.  // Multichannel News;5/19/2003, Vol. 24 Issue 20, p5 

    Presents news briefs related to cable industry in the U.S. as of May 19, 2003. Rejection by Senate Commerce Committee chairman JohnMcCain Republican, Arizona to require members of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to testify before his panel prior to the agency's June 2, 2003 vote to...

  • Court Voids 30% Cable Cap. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;03/05/2001, Vol. 22 Issue 10, p2 

    Reports that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit struck down a slew of cable-ownership rules in a case that could have broad implications on the structure of both the cable and broadcast industries. Background on the legal challenge to U.S. Federal...

  • FCC Denies Stay of Dual-Carriage Order.  // Multichannel News;9/3/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 34, p21 

    The article reports on the denial of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission regarding broadcasters' request for a stay of its viewability/dual-carriage decision which mandates that hybrid analog/digital cable systems do not have to deliver must-carry TV stations in both formats.

  • Must-Carry, Broadcast Flag Top Powell's Busy Fall Agenda. Mundy, Alicia // Cable World (10427228);10/6/2003, Vol. 15 Issue 37, p10 

    Presents an overview of the agenda of U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Michael Powell in the fall of 2003. Plan of the FFC to revisit the Net Neutrality issue which was raised by a coalition of Microsoft Corp., Walt Disney Co., Amazon.com and others; Discussion on the issue...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics