TITLE

FCC VoIP Rule To Omit Cable, Sources Report

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
Multichannel News;10/25/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 43, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Deals with the pending decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to preempt state regulation of Vonage Identities and companies that offer voice-over-Internet protocol services in October 2004. Efforts of the companies to urge the agency to broaden the scope of the ruling; Petition filed by Vonage to the agency; Details of the related litigation faced by the firm; Controversies over the ruling.
ACCESSION #
14885853

 

Related Articles

  • REFRESHING NEW VOICE. Clancy, Heather // CRN;11/22/2004, Issue 1122, p26 

    Deals with the ruling imposed by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on a legal case involving voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) provider Vonage and the state of Minnesota. Implication of the decision of the FCC for computer solution providers in the U.S.; Information on the...

  • The end of Vonage? Morris, Iain // Telecommunications - International Edition;Jun2007, Vol. 41 Issue 6, p16 

    The article reports legal battles faced by Vonage, a Voice-over Internet Protocol (VoIP) provider, in the U.S. The firm has been found guilty of infringing technology patents held by telecommunication giant Verizon. On the other hand, Vonage won a stay of execution that permit the firm to...

  • GETTING A GRIP ON VOIP. Prah, Pamela M. // State Legislatures;May2005, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p28 

    Discusses issues on the proposed regulation of Voice over Internet Protocol and other Internet-based telephone systems in the U.S. Argument of Internet-based companies on the classification of their services; Possible effect of a court ruling that freed the Internet telephone company Vonage...

  • FCC briefs part of court record. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;4/10/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 15, p12 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to back the wireless industry in health litigation against mobile-phone companies. The FCC in November 2005 sought court permission to participate in the litigation, particularly with respect to the agency's...

  • U S West threatens to sue on paging interconnect ruling. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR;06/26/2000, Vol. 19 Issue 26, p4 

    Reports the threat of telephone company U S West to file a lawsuit against a United States Federal Communications Commission interconnect ruling favoring the paging industry. Reaction of the paging industry to the ruling; Settlement of complaints from TSR Wireless Inc. and Metrocall Inc. by the...

  • BELL ATLANTIC TELEPHONE COS. V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION. Chen, Ernest H. // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2001, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p369 

    Focuses on the case of Bell Atlantic Telephone Cos. versus the Federal Communications Commission in the United States. History of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Discussion of the court decision; Inclusion of Internet Service Provider-bound traffic in reciprocal compensation obligation;...

  • FCC Unplugging Terrestrial Exemption. Eggerton, John // Multichannel News;1/25/2010, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p26 

    The article reports on the decision of the federal Communications Commission (FCC) to close delivered networks from getting program access rules to cable-owned regional sports networks in the U.S. It states that the court order is still pending and that FCC's program-access rules calls for cable...

  • EDITOR'S NOTE:. Drummond, Mike // Inventors' Digest;May2007 Newsletter, Vol. 23, p2 

    The author talks about several infringement and patent lawsuits in the U.S. According to him, several cases of infringement lawsuits were waged in the year 2007. The firm Every Penny Counts is suing the Bank of America Corp. because of its charge that the bank stole the idea from its Keep the...

  • Vonage Buffeted By Legal Setbacks. Scoblete, Greg // TWICE: This Week in Consumer Electronics;4/9/2007, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p40 

    The article reports on a patent suit filed by Verizon against Vonage. The author states that the U.S. District Court ruled that Vonage had to pay $58 million to Verizon and 5.5 percent of royalties on future sales. A judge released an injunction against Vonage to bar it from using its infringed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics