November 2004
Scholastic News -- Edition 4;11/01/2004, Vol. 67 Issue 7, p7
Presents responses of children to a debate on whether animal dissection should be required during science lesson. Statement issued by Marjan Rahman of New York; Remarks from Lizzie Mattingly of Indiana.


Related Articles

  • Argumentation and Primary Science. Naylor, S.; Keogh, B.; Downing, B. // Research in Science Education;Mar2007, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p17 

    The importance of argumentation in science education is outlined and the relatively low level of argumentation typically observed in classrooms in the UK is noted, along with possible reasons for this. The research sets out to determine the extent to which primary school pupils engage in...

  • Fruit Fundamentals. Yates-Berg, Daniel S. // Science Teacher;May2002, Vol. 69 Issue 5, p54 

    Reports the challenges faced by anatomy and physiology instructors in teaching dissection skills. Concern for the preservation of structures essential to the dissection technique; Importance of standard dissecting instruments in animal dissection; Safety precautions pertaining to appropriate...

  • Is It Living? Keeley, Page // Science & Children;Apr2011, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p24 

    The article offers author's insights on the Is It Living? formative assessment probe in science education, which could be used to reveal the elementary students' conception of the word living. The author says that the probe was an effective instructional tool to develop the norm of argumentation...

  • Learning and Justification during a Science Teaching Sequence. Skoumios, Michael // International Journal of Learning;2009, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p327 

    Two of the basic dimensions characterizing the quality of the dialogic argumentation developed by the pupils in the classroom is the content (i.e., the accuracy or adequacy of the various elements in the argument when they are evaluated from a school science knowledge perspective) and the...

  • Effects of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions. Hefter, Markus; Berthold, Kirsten; Renkl, Alexander; Riess, Werner; Schmid, Sebastian; Fries, Stefan // Instructional Science;Nov2014, Vol. 42 Issue 6, p929 

    Argumentation skills play a crucial role in science education and in preparing school students to act as informed citizens. While processing conflicting scientific positions regarding topics such as sustainable development in the domain of ecology, argumentation skills such as evaluating...

  • Choice to Dissect?  // Scholastic News -- Edition 4;10/25/2002, Vol. 65 Issue 7, p7 

    Presents a debate on whether school children should have a choice about dissecting dead frogs for science class. Purpose of giving students a choice; Negative aspect of having a choice.

  • DEVELOPING A SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENT. Fulton, Lori; Poeltler, Emily // Science & Children;Summer2013, Vol. 50 Issue 9, p30 

    The authors, a professor and a second grade teacher, discuss methods for teaching elementary students scientific communication skills such as debating skills and how to support scientific claims with evidence. Reasoning in children, class discussions, and written versus oral arguments are...

  • Cut Out Frog Dissection: YES or NO?  // Scholastic Action;09/18/2000, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p15 

    Presents a debate on whether students should dissect frogs in science class.

  • Dissection Doesn't Cut It. Lupatsky, Linda // Teen Ink;May2000, Vol. 11 Issue 9, p18 

    The author criticizes the practice of dissecting vertebrate animals in American classrooms. According to the author, supply houses have blatantly violated laws regarding transportation and housing of animals. She notes that the principal goal of life sciences education is to teach respect for...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics