TITLE

From The New Republic Mail Bag

PUB. DATE
September 1942
SOURCE
New Republic;9/7/42, Vol. 107 Issue 10, p288
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a clarification regarding the Pelley case that was discussed in the July 10 issue. Criticism against the defendant for his frivolous attitude; Stand taken by the court in the case; Comments of a reader about treatment meted out to India by Great Britain.
ACCESSION #
14859470

 

Related Articles

  • Underscorings. A. P. F. // America;5/24/1947, Vol. 77 Issue 8, p201 

    The article reports several court decisions in the U.S. . The State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld the lower court decision, denying the claim of the petitioner that parochial pupils should ride on public school busses. The California Supreme penned, in denying the petition of Rita Gordon,...

  • What's New in the Law. Ashman, Allan // American Bar Association Journal;Jun77, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p856 

    Reports on developments in U.S. law, as used in decisions in several cases across the U.S. in 1977. Physician advertising in Virginia; Movie and television rights for the novel 'The Son of the Sheik,' written by Edith Maude Hull; Appearance of a defendant in one crime to appear in a lineup in...

  • The Missed Revolution: How Twombly and Iqbal Tilted the Legal Playing Field While Political Science Remained Silent. YACOBUCCI, PETER; MCGOVERN, PATRICK // Politics, Bureaucracy & Justice;2014, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p42 

    Two recent Supreme Court decisions, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009), sent shockwaves through legal and academic circles by introducing a plausibility requirement for all pleadings to be sufficient. Because of these decisions, the likelihood of dismissal in all...

  • Appeals Court To Hear Arguments Over SMO's Future. Lynch, Kerry // Weekly of Business Aviation;4/28/2014, Vol. 98 Issue 17, p6 

    The article reports that the city of Santa Monica filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals after a U.S. District Court ruled that it is too late for the city to sue for control of Santa Monica Airport (SMO). It mentions that now the U.S. Court of Appeals will consider arguments next fall...

  • SCHEEHLE V. JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURT'S RIGHT TO COMPEL ATTORNEYS TO SERVE AS ARBITRATORS. Le, Tracy // Arizona Law Review;Summer2006, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p413 

    The author presents an analysis of the ruling of the Arizona Supreme Court in Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court to compel lawyers to serve as arbitrators. The Arizona Supreme Court was correct in ruling that state bar members can be compelled to render community service serve as...

  • CIRCUIT BY CIRCUIT. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Sep2001, Vol. 11 Issue 118, p66 

    Presents several United States Court of Appeals cases. Refusal of the court to invalidate a notice of appeal filed in relation to the Harrison v. Wahatoyas LLC case; Disqualification of plaintiff lawyer of the case SuperGuide Corp. v. DirectTV Enterprise Inc.; Decision on the retaliatory...

  • JUST JUSTICE. Knox, John C. // Saturday Evening Post;7/24/1943, Vol. 216 Issue 4, p22 

    The article argues that the U.S. civil courts do not need reform as proposed by Judge Jerome Frank of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It offers information on the concerns of Frank regarding court decisions without adequate evidence. It explores how perjury fails to...

  • WAITING TO BE AN AMERICAN: THE COURTS' PROPER ROLE AND FUNCTION IN ALLEVIATING NATURALIZATION APPLICANTS' WOES IN 8 U.S.C. § 1447(B) ACTIONS. Schneider, Jessica // St. Louis University Public Law Review;2010, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p581 

    The article focuses on the function of courts in relieving the woes of naturalization applicants in the U.S. It offers analysis on the conflicting opinions among courts as to the capability of 8 U.S.C. §1447 (b) to offer exclusive jurisdiction to the district court over pending naturalization...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Delivers Bad News to Many Families in Case That Lengthens the Cue for Aged-out Children. Phulwani, Michael; Nachman, David H.; Singh, Rabindra K. // Desi Talk;6/27/2014, Vol. 18 Issue 26, p28 

    The article reports that in the case Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, a U.S. Supreme Court ruled against thousands of aspiring young immigrants who were included on their parents' visa petitions as minors, but who turned 21.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics