TITLE

SQUANDERING THE GAIN: GAINSHARING AND THE CONTINUING DILEMMA OF PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

AUTHOR(S)
Saver, Richard S.
PUB. DATE
October 2003
SOURCE
Northwestern University Law Review;Fall2003, Vol. 98 Issue 1, p145
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the ban on gainsharing programs by U.S. hospitals. Legal background surrounding gainsharing; History of the Medicare and Medicaid statutory restrictions; Information on the experience of various industries with gainsharing.
ACCESSION #
14843109

Tags: GAIN sharing;  HOSPITALS;  MEDICARE;  MEDICAID;  INDUSTRIES -- United States

 

Related Articles

  • Measuring Effectiveness in Banks and Hospitals with Productivity Gainsharing Formulas. Hauck, Warren C. // Industrial Management;Mar/Apr86, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p26 

    Focuses on the measurement effectiveness of productivity gainsharing formulas on banks and hospitals in the U.S. Emotional involvement of the consumer; Determination of cost control efforts; Specification of managerial orientations.

  • Saving lives, money. Robeznieks, Andis // Modern Healthcare;6/2/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 22, p16 

    The article offers information on HAC-focused gainsharing, a model which is aimed at the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' rule stopping reimbursement for certain kinds of never events after October 1, 2008. If a hospital's physicians, nurses and other clinical staffers save money...

  • Gain-sharing demo unveiled. Romano, Michael // Modern Healthcare;9/11/2006, Vol. 36 Issue 36, p12 

    The article offers information on the gain-sharing demonstration given by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It aimed at rewarding physicians for lowering costs while improving quality and efficiency. It will be the first to connect all types of medical group practice...

  • Demo derby. Lubell, Jennifer // Modern Healthcare;8/24/2009, Vol. 39 Issue 34, p0012 

    The article reports on the support given by hospitals and physicians to initiatives by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) aiming to improve healthcare quality. The value-based purchasing initiative of the agency aims to tie Medicare payments to performance on quality and...

  • No gain-sharing in N.J. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;11/1/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 44, p18 

    Reports on the decision of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to invalidate the revival of the New Jersey Hospital Association's gain-sharing in the pay-for-performance demonstration project in October 2004. Information on the project; Legal barriers to the project; Reaction of...

  • Focus on gain-sharing. Blesch, Gregg; Zigmond, Jessica // Modern Healthcare;4/21/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 16, p9 

    The article focuses on the proposed rule on inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) issued by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The rule solicits comments regarding so-called gain-sharing arrangements, which allow physicians to share the wealth when they save money...

  • Budget boosts gain-sharing. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;2/13/2006, Vol. 36 Issue 7, p10 

    The article reports on the approval of the U.S. Deficit Reduction Act in February 2006. With the approval, hospitals can already legitimize physician gain-sharing as a conventional way to contain costs and improve quality. A part of the law's provision, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid...

  • Pressure on for gain-sharing demos. Mantone, Joseph // Modern Healthcare;9/4/2006, Vol. 36 Issue 35, p12 

    This article deals with the pressure facing the U.S. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to comply with a federally mandated gain-sharing demonstration program. Without quick action by the CMS, the six projects in the program may not get off the ground by November 1, 2006, as mandated...

  • CMS Includes Additional Stark Proposals in IPPS Proposed Rule, Requests Comments.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2008 Q2, Special section p1 

    This article focuses on the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) proposed rule updating the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS). One of the proposed changes in the Phase III rule pertains to the so-called stand in the shoes (SITS) provision. CMS also addresses...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics