TITLE

Patient-Controlled versus Nurse-Administered Sedation With Propofol During Colonoscopy. A Prospective Randomized Trial

AUTHOR(S)
Heuss, Ludwig T.; Drewe, Juergen; Schnieper, Patrizia; Tapparelli, Claudia B.; Pflimlin, Eric; Beglinger, Christoph
PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Mar2004, Vol. 99 Issue 3, p511
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol, is well tolerated and reduces recovery time and staff required during endoscopic interventions.“Who” administers the drug proves economically crucial. With the aim of maintaining safety, medical quality, and patient satisfaction, this study investigates PCSversusnurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) in a cohort of consecutive patients.METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients, aged 22–90 yr, undergoing only colonoscopy participated in this prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either PCS or NAPS. If patients declined randomization for different reasons of reluctance to PCS they were assigned to a standard nurse-sedated control group. All patients received pethidine presedation for analgesia. Visual analogue scales followed patient anxiety level, tolerability, pain, and satisfaction, and endoscopist's assessment of the procedure.RESULTS: Given the choice, 35% of the patients who were rather younger and more anxious declined randomization to PCS. The mean total dose of propofol needed in this group was higher, but the patients had a tendency to rate the global tolerance and the pain of the examination as less comfortable compared to the two randomized groups. Self-administration of propofol created a significantly different drug profile and higher medication costs. With regard to the safety parameters there was no difference between PCS and NAPS. In their global assessments, the patients and endoscopists tended to prefer NAPS.CONCLUSIONS: Individual patient characteristics and attitudes toward self-control are crucial for PCS. While being a viable option for patients who are able and willing to handle, this technique is not applicable in a considerable portion of everyday patients.
ACCESSION #
14816773

 

Related Articles

  • Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Pohl, J.; Lotterer, E.; Balzer, C.; Sackmann, M.; Schmidt, K.-D.; Gossner, L.; Schaab, C.; Frieling, T.; Medve, M.; Mayer, G.; Nguyen-Tat, M.; Eli, C. // Gut;Jan2009, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p73 

    Objective: Colonoscopy is the accepted gold standard for screening of neoplastic colorectal lesions, but the substantial miss rate remains a challenge. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy with the Fujinon intelligent colour enhancement (FICE) system is a new dyeless imaging technique that might...

  • COLONONSCOPY COMPLETION RATES: THE VALUE OF A CODED LEAGUE TABLE. Fulls, E.; Riley, S. A. // Gut;Apr2004 Supplement 3, Vol. 53, pA53 

    This article focuses on a study related to colononscopy completion rates. A recent BSG/intercollegiate audit of colonoscopy practice has highlighted the problem of low colonoscopy completion rates. The publication of a coded league table of colononoscopy completion rates, was associated with...

  • WHAT PRICE MODERN GASTROENTEROLOGY? Spellberg, Mitchell A. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct1977, Vol. 68 Issue 4, p405 

    Addresses the price or cost of modern gastroenterology to the patient and the U.S. public. Discussion on two modalities namely, colonoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Advantage of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Significance of randomized clinical trials.

  • The Impact of Colon Cleanliness Assessment on Endoscopists' Recommendations for Follow-Up Colonoscopy. Ben-Horin, Shomron; Bar-Meir, Simon; Avidan, Benjamin // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2007, Vol. 102 Issue 12, p2680 

    OBJECTIVE: Repeat colonoscopy is advocated for low-quality preparations. However, there are few data on how endoscopists assess the quality of bowel preparation. We aimed to investigate, in a visually reproducible manner, endoscopists' assessment of colon cleanliness, as reflected by their...

  • Should the Quality of Preparation Impact Postcolonoscopy Follow-Up Recommendations? Bond, John H. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Dec2007, Vol. 102 Issue 12, p2686 

    A high-quality bowel cleansing preparation is an essential prerequisite for a safe, efficient, and accurate colonoscopy. Large studies, however, have shown that up to 25% of patients undergoing colonoscopy have what is considered to be an inadequate preparation. A well-done survey reported in...

  • Abdominal pain after attempted endoscopic mucosal resection of a right-sided colonic lesion. Sarkar, S.; Tagore, V.; White, D. // Gut;Jan2009, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p33 

    The article presents a case of 61-year old male suffering from abdominal pain after attempted endoscopic mucosal resection of a right-sided colonic lesion. Prior to the abdominal pain, the patient underwent a routine colonoscopy and a 1.5 cm sessile polyp was found within the caecum. On...

  • Endoscopy Global Rating Scale: patient comfort auditing at a county hospital. Taylor, Therese // Gastrointestinal Nursing;Dec/Jan2008, Vol. 5 Issue 10, p28 

    The Endoscopy Global Rating Scale has been designed and implemented to assess the extent to which endoscopy service providers are giving a patient-centred service. One of the standards is patient comfort and the level C we had achieved needed improving. A session at the British Society of...

  • Sedation and polyp detection. Gerstenberger, Patrick; Cohen, Lawrence; Rex, Douglas; Gerstenberger, Patrick D; Cohen, Lawrence B; Rex, Douglas K // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Nov2010, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p3289 

    No abstract available.

  • Does Magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging or Magnifying Chromoendoscopy Help Experienced Endoscopists Assess Invasion Depth of Large Sessile and Flat Polyps? Jang, Hui; Park, Soo; Cheon, Jae; Kim, Tae; Kim, Won; Hong, Sung // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Jul2014, Vol. 59 Issue 7, p1520 

    Background: Distinguishing deep submucosa (SM) from superficial SM cancer in large sessile and flat colorectal polyps (>2 cm) is crucial in making the most appropriate therapeutic decision. We evaluated the additional role of magnifying narrow-band imaging (NBI) and magnifying chromoendoscopy...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics