TITLE

Prospective Comparison of Contrast Enhanced CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasms in a Single Institutional Study Using Second-Look Colonoscopy with Discrepant Results

AUTHOR(S)
Hoppe, Hanno; Netzer, Peter; Spreng, Adrian; Quattropani, Cristiana; Mattich, Joerg; Dinkel, Hans-Peter
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct2004, Vol. 99 Issue 10, p1924
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in Western countries. Early detection by colorectal cancer screening can effectively cut its mortality rate. CT colonography represents a promising, minimally invasive alternative to conventional methods of colorectal carcinoma screening.AIMS: The purpose of this prospective single institutional study was to compare the abilities of routine clinical CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy to detect colorectal neoplasms using second-look colonoscopy to clarify discrepant results.PATIENTS AND METHODS: CT colonography was performed in 100 symptomatic patients using contrast enhanced multidetector CT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. If results were discrepant, a second-look colonoscopy was performed after unblinding. CT colonographic findings were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy.RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy found 122 colorectal neoplasms in 49 patients. The overall sensitivity of CT colonography at detecting patients with at least one polyp 6 mm or larger was 76% and its specificity was 88%. Its by-patient sensitivity for polyps 10 mm or larger was 95% and its specificity was 98%. By-polyp sensitivities were 71% for polyps 10 mm or larger, and 61% for polyps 6 mm or larger. A second-look colonoscopy was performed in 19 patients and two initial false-positive findings of CT colonography were reclassified as true-positive. For conventional colonoscopy, this produced a by-polyp sensitivity of 94% for detection of lesions 6 mm and larger.CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography had both a high by-patient sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically important colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or larger. This suggests that CT colonography has the potential to become a valuable clinical screening method for colorectal neoplasms.
ACCESSION #
14816488

 

Related Articles

  • Positron emission tomography in neoplasms of the digestive system. Mihailović, Jasna; Freeman, Leonard M. // Archive of Oncology;Dec2012, Vol. 20 Issue 3/4, p86 

    PET/CT has proven to be extremely useful in studying neoplasms of the colon and esophagus. It has been less promising for lesions of the stomach, pancreas and hepatobiliary tract. Colorectal cancer is the third most common non-cutaneous cancer representing 13% of all malignancies. The use of...

  • Results of Screening Colonoscopy among Persons 40 to 49 Years of Age. Imperiale, Thomas F.; Wagner, David R.; Lin, Ching Y.; Larkin, Gregory N.; Rogge, James D.; Ransohoff, David F. // New England Journal of Medicine;6/6/2002, Vol. 346 Issue 23, p1781 

    Background: The prevalence of colorectal lesions in persons 40 to 49 years of age, as identified on colonoscopy, has not been determined. Methods: We reviewed the procedure and pathology reports for 906 consecutive persons 40 to 49 years of age who voluntarily participated in an employer-based...

  • Simple test for colon cancer. Segell, Michael // Cosmopolitan;Sep95, Vol. 219 Issue 3, p94 

    Reports on a test for diagnosis of colon cancer. Obsolescence of colonoscopy; Development of technique to collect cells; Cost of procedure.

  • Multisociety task force updates guidelines for colorectal cancer screening.  // Geriatrics;Apr2003, Vol. 58 Issue 4, p16 

    Announces the update issued by the U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer for colorectal screening. Retention of the recommendation to start screening at the age of 50; Identification of colonoscopy as the only screening tool recommended for high-risk groups. INSET: Take Home points.

  • Study: Overuse of Risky Screening Colonoscopies in Elderly. WOLFE, SIDNEY M. // Health Letter;Jul2013, Vol. 29 Issue 7, p5 

    The article focuses on a study, published in the medical journal "JAMA Internal Medicine," revealing the health risks involved in the use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in older people.

  • SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM OF COLON BASED ON MULTI-SLICE CT COLONOGRAPHY. Mohammed Shabbir Ahamed; Yizhong Hu; Eiji Takahashi; Suzuki, Hidenobu; Kawata, Yoshiki; Niki, Noboru; Iinuma, Gen; Suzuki, Masahiro; Moriyama, Noriyuki // Advances in Computer Science & Engineering;Nov2012, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p83 

    Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in this world; detection and prevention are the challenges of this century. In this paper, we aimed to invent early detection of colon cancer by the segmentation of colon and the analysis of each segmented part for getting this...

  • A critical look at colon cancer testing.  // HealthFacts;Nov98, Vol. 23 Issue 11, p5 

    Presents a look at color cancer testing. Media coverage of colon cancer diagnosis of baseball player Daryl Strawberry; Contradictions in the message to the public about value of screening for color cancer; Screening procedures; United States Preventive Services Task Force's information about...

  • Too early to introduce colorectal screening, say specialists. Ferriman, Annabel // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);05/20/2000, Vol. 320 Issue 7246, p1361 

    Reports that mass screening for colorectal cancer should not be introduced in Great Britain before the results of clinical trials, according to a statement issued jointly by colorectal specialists. Advice for doctors in the statement; Specialist journal where the study was published;...

  • The use of gene tests to detect hereditary predisposition to cancer. Brown, Martin L.; Kesler, Larry G. // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;8/2/95, Vol. 87 Issue 15, p1131 

    Explores the economic implications of conducting a population-wide screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) compared with restricted screening among members of the families at high risk. Determinants of cost-effectiveness of HNPCC testing program; Population prevalence of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics