TITLE

Evaluation of Polyp Detection in Relation to Procedure Time of Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy

AUTHOR(S)
Sanchez, William; Harewood, Gavin C.; Petersen, Bret T.
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
American Journal of Gastroenterology;Oct2004, Vol. 99 Issue 10, p1941
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multiple factors influence the yield of colonoscopy for the detection of neoplasia. Few studies have addressed the impact of colonoscopy duration on procedure yield. The aim of our study was to determine whether endoscopist-specific procedure times correlate with the number and clinical significance of polyps detected at screening or surveillance colonoscopy.METHODS: Procedural data from screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, between January 1, 1996 and June 30, 2000, were reviewed. Individual endoscopists were characterized by their personal endoscopist procedure mean time (EPMT) to perform a negative colonoscopy. Procedure time included patient's consent and sedation. EPMT was then correlated with individual polyp detection rates.RESULTS: Overall, 10,159 colonoscopies were reviewed of which 4,312 (42.4%) yielded polyps. Polyp detection varied among endoscopists between 19.0% and 62.3%. There was a close correlation between EPMT and polyp yield (all sizes), r= 0.64, although correlation was weaker for polyps>10 mm (r= 0.42) and polyps>20 mm (r= 0.20). On multivariate analysis, longer mean endoscopist time was associated with colonic lesion detection, OR= 1.54 (95% CI 1.37–1.62). Longer mean procedure duration demonstrated a looser association with identification of polyps>10 mm, OR= 1.40 (1.19–1.64) and polyps>20 mm, OR= 1.03 (0.74–1.43).CONCLUSIONS: There is a direct correlation between colonoscopy procedure time and yield, with a three-fold variation of polyp detection rates. These results should prompt future prospective studies assessing the impact of colonoscopic withdrawal time on lesion detection.
ACCESSION #
14816478

 

Related Articles

  • Experienced nurses help catch polyps.  // RN;Feb2009, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p16 

    The article reports that a retrospective analysis of screening colonoscopies between 2003 and 2005 has revealed that inexperienced nurses may detect fewer polyps. It is reported that a polyp was detected in 40.3% of procedures which were staffed with nurses with six months or less of experience...

  • Screening colonoscopy in the asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-old population. Mehran, A.; Jaffe, P.; Efron, J.; Vernavay, A.; Liberman, A.; Vernava, A // Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2003, Vol. 17 Issue 12, p1974 

    Background: In an effort to decrease the death rate from colorectal cancer, a multitude of medical societies and task forces recommend routine screening for colorectal cancer beginning at age 50. Yet, there is no consensus as to the best and most cost-effective screening method....

  • ADVANCES IN ENDOSCOPY: Current Developments in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy. Serrated Polyps and Synchronous Advanced Neoplasia in Average-Risk Persons. Bessa, Xavier // Gastroenterology & Hepatology;Mar2014, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p190 

    An interview with consultant gastroenterologist Xavier Bessa is presented. He discusses the significance of serrated colon polyps which develop in the proximal colon that called serrated neoplasia pathway. He highlights different types of serrated polyps including diminutive, sessile and pale...

  • Measuring Medical Quality: Is a Slower Colonoscopy Really Better? Kirsch, Michael // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Apr2008, Vol. 103 Issue 4, p823 

    The author reflects on the quality of medical care, particularly on the performance of colonoscopists in performing colonoscopy. He cites the conclusion of a study, which states that the longer the colonoscopists spend time in the examination the more they find polyps, which means that the...

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Laxative-Free Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detection of Adenomatous Polyps in Asymptomatic Adults. Zalis, Michael E.; Blake, Michael A.; Cai, Wenli; Hahn, Peter F.; Halpern, Elkan F.; Kazam, Imrana G.; Keroack, Myles; Magee, Cordula; Näppi, Janne J.; Perez-Johnston, Rocio; Saltzman, John R.; Vij, Abhinav; Yee, Judy; Yoshida, Hiroyuki // Annals of Internal Medicine;5/15/2012, Vol. 156 Issue 10, p692 

    Background: Colon screening by optical colonoscopy (OC) or computed tomographic colonography (CTC) requires a laxative bowel preparation, which inhibits screening participation. Objective: To assess the performance of detecting adenomas 6 mm or larger and patient experience of laxative-free,...

  • SCREEN TIME.  // Time International (South Pacific Edition);8/30/2004, Issue 34, p75 

    The article reports on the increasing use of colonoscopies by physicians in the U.S. to check patients whose colorectal polyps have already been removed. A survey in the Annals of Internal Medicine finds that many doctors perform follow-up colonoscopies more frequently, which puts patients at...

  • DIAGNOSTICUL ENDOSCOPIC AL TUMORILOR COLORECTALE PRECOCE. Tanţău, Alina; Lencu, Monica; Pascu, Oliviu // Clujul Medical;Dec2009, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p469 

    Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers from over the world (1). Colonoscopy is for a very long time accepted as the most efficacy method for colorectal diagnosis and prevention. Neoplasic colonic lesions are polipoid type and non-polypoid type. Japanese classification of...

  • Reduction of miss rates of colonic adenomas by zoom chromoendoscopy. Stergiou, N.; Frenz, M. B.; Menke, D.; Riphaus, A.; Wehrmann, T. // International Journal of Colorectal Disease;Nov2006, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p560 

    The article reports on a study which determined the detection of rate of polyps using zoom chromoendoscopy (ZE) compared with standard video colonoscopy. End-to-end colonoscopies were performed in the patients included in the study. Correct differentiation was allowed between hyperplastic and...

  • Sedation and polyp detection. Gerstenberger, Patrick; Cohen, Lawrence; Rex, Douglas; Gerstenberger, Patrick D; Cohen, Lawrence B; Rex, Douglas K // Digestive Diseases & Sciences;Nov2010, Vol. 55 Issue 11, p3289 

    No abstract available.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics