TITLE

Latest Supreme Court docket light on liability cases

AUTHOR(S)
Hofmann, Mark A.
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
Business Insurance;10/11/2004, Vol. 38 Issue 41, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court appears likely to deal with an unusually sparse docket of liability-related cases in its current term. The case, which asks whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act allows disparate-impact claims, began when Jesse Jackson adopted a new pay policy for public safety officers that, when compared with its previous policy, gave proportionately larger raises to employees with five or fewer years of service than it did to officers with more seniority. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the ADEA does not allow a disparate-impact suit. A three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held for Birmingham.
ACCESSION #
14798854

 

Related Articles

  • Physician deemed 'too old' for post can't pursue age discrimination claim. Greenwald, Judy // Business Insurance;1/30/2006, Vol. 40 Issue 5, p4 

    The article presents a case which states that Doctor Riaz Baqir who allegedly lost his job at a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs hospital because he was too old cannot pursue his age discrimination claim, according to an appellate court. The facts of the case are detailed. Career background...

  • Cash-balance plans to remain.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);09/17/99, Vol. 46 Issue 38, p4A 

    Reports on the United States Internal Revenue Service's intention to allow the use of cash balance pension plans despite claims that the plans discriminate against older workers.

  • Age 60 rule revisited. R.B.P. // Business & Commercial Aviation;Dec93, Vol. 73 Issue 6, p39 

    Reports on the debate on the rule that prohibits pilots who are over 60 years of age from flying as pilots-in-command. Federal Aviation Administration's meeting on the age restriction among pilots; Factors that contribute to the implementation of the age restriction rule; Disagreement of...

  • Court Rejects Reverse Age Discrimination. Clark, Margaret M. // HR Magazine;Apr2004, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p29 

    Reports on a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that reverses a 2002 decision of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on an age discrimination suit against the firm General Dynamics. Failure of the age discrimination law in the U.S. to protect younger workers from workplace decisions that favor...

  • Anti-ageism protagonists divided on voluntary code. Whitehead, Mark // People Management;6/30/1999, Vol. 5 Issue 13, p17 

    Focuses on the British government's voluntary code of practice against ageism at work, called the `Code of Practice on Age Diversity in Employment.' What the code includes; Various comments on code.

  • Czechs plan laws to tackle rampant discrimination. Walsh, Jennie // People Management;01/14/99, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p16 

    Reports on the plans of Vladimir Spidla, minister of Labor and Social Affairs in the Czech Republic, to change the employment laws to outlaw sexist and ageist recruitment advertisements. Examples of discriminatory job advertisements in the Czech press; Views of recruitment experts on the planned...

  • High Court Amplifies Law on Age Bias. Hendrie, Caroline // Education Week;4/6/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 30, p24 

    The article reports that a new ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that makes it easier for older workers to win age discrimination claims may prove to be a "double-edged sword" for school districts interested in raising the pay of their more-junior teachers, a school law expert said last week. In...

  • The Supreme court ruled. MacLachlan, Suzanne; Mutch, David // Christian Science Monitor;6/15/95, Vol. 87 Issue 140, p2 

    Informs the verdict of the Supreme court on the payment of taxes on back pays and damages awarded on claims of workplace age discrimination.

  • IPA alerts industry to consequences of govt's ageism code.  // Campaign;07/09/99, Issue 27, p8 

    Reports on the Great Britain-based Institute of Practitioners in Advertising's warning to advertising agencies regarding the British government's policies covering age discrimination in employment.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics