TITLE

Fox TV Faces S1.2M in Fines For 'Indecency'

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
Multichannel News;10/18/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 42, p26
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the proposal by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to fine Fox TV broadcast-network affiliates for violating indecency rules with the April 2003 broadcast of the television program, "Married by America." Total value of the fine; Description of the alleged indecent scenes from the program; Arguments given by Fox to defend its side.
ACCESSION #
14774901

 

Related Articles

  • Fox Affils Seeking to Preview Shows. Halonen, Doug; Block, Alex Ben // Television Week;10/18/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 42, p1A 

    Reports on the decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to impose a fine on Fox Broadcasting Co. and its affiliates for allowing indecent material on the reality television program "Married by America." Actions taken by the company and its affiliates to prevent the recurrence of...

  • Complaint Fraud. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Mar2006, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p14 

    The article reports on the increase in indecency complaints against the content of broadcast programming in the United States in 2005 according to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Activists and legislators expressed concerns over the idea of parents leaving their children alone while...

  • OBSCENE PRIORITIES IN CONGRESS. Shales, Tom // Television Week;1/23/2006, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p58 

    The article comments on the efforts of the U.S. Congress to develop a regulation for censorship. It discusses the importance of having a regulation for excessive televised violence and sex. It questions the actions taken by the Federal Communications Commission to address the issue. It...

  • Children's TV Act. Martin, Harry C. // Broadcast Engineering;Sep2008, Vol. 50 Issue 9, p22 

    The article reports on the fine issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to a television (TV) station in the U.S. The FCC has issued its first fine to the Class A TV station for failure to have enough amount of children's educational or informational (E/I) programming. The station...

  • FLASH!  // Broadcasting & Cable;1/23/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 4, p10 

    The article comments on issues concerning the U.S. television broadcasting industry. The first meeting of the Federal Communications Commission for the year has been so collegial that members managed to joke each other. Proponents of an indecency bill in the Congress should monitor the nature...

  • Court keeps big three out of syndication until 1995. HAJ // Broadcasting & Cable;7/18/94, Vol. 124 Issue 29, p15 

    Reports on Court of Appeals' confirmation of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) rule barring the major broadcast networks from entering the domestic syndication business until November 1995. Networks' acquisition of financial interest and syndication rights in aired programs;...

  • Semantic battle over children's TV. McConnell, Chris // Broadcasting & Cable;10/30/95, Vol. 125 Issue 44, p22 

    Reports on the confusion regarding the definition of children's education television show between broadcasters, children's television advocates and regulators in the United States. Federal Communications Commission head Reed Hundt's suggestion that the commission turn to the academe to judge the...

  • TV violence in pols' sights. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;3/23/2004, Vol. 383 Issue 7, p4 

    A group of influential lawmakers is asking the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate whether the government should treat violent TV programming the same way it treats broadcast smut. In a letter to FCC chairman Michael Powell, 39 lawmakers, including the chairman and senior...

  • PTC goes O-for-36 in FCC gripes. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;1/25/2005, Vol. 387 Issue 29, p6 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission which rejected three dozen indecency complaints, saying they did not rise to the standard necessary for a violation despite some partial nudity and isolated uses of the word 'dick' or variations thereof. The complaints were filed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics