TITLE

Labor Law and Preparedness

PUB. DATE
October 1940
SOURCE
New Republic;10/14/40, Vol. 103 Issue 16, p510
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the actions taken by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board, against Bethlehem Steel Corp., a producer of armament and ships, for defying the labor law which states that employers may not deprive workers of the right to self-organization and collective bargaining through representatives of their own choosing. Criticism of the practice of the government of buying materials from the companies which have refused to obey the federal labor laws; Decision taken by the National Defense Advisory Commission to preserve labor standards in the defense effort, and that no orders would be given to employers who were violating labor laws; Situation pointed out by the workers of Bethlehem Steel Corp., explaining that because of the refusal of collective bargaining, workers were on the verge of striking.
ACCESSION #
14749506

 

Related Articles

  • Labor Law and Preparedness.  // New Republic;10/14/40, Vol. 103 Issue 16, p510 

    Focuses on the actions taken by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board, against Bethlehem Steel Corp., a producer of armament and ships, for defying the labor law which states that employers may not deprive workers of the right to self-organization and collective bargaining through...

  • ANALYZING RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. Dolin, Kenneth R. // Labor Law Journal;Summer2005, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p120 

    This article analyzes developments at the U.S. National Labor Relations Board. In the Oakwood Care Center case, the board held in a decision that bargaining units consisting of employees employed by a user employer with employees employed by the user employer and a supplier employer are...

  • Partial Strikes and the National Labor Relations Act. Prozzi, James A. // Labor Law Journal;May86, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p315 

    The article describes the provisions on partial strikes found in the National Labor Relations Act in the U.S. The National Labor Relations Act guarantees in Section 7 to all private sector employees, whether unionized or not, the right to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of...

  • MULTIPLANT UNITS: THE NLRB'S WITHDRAWAL OF FREE CHOICE. Brooks, George W.; Thompson, Mark // ILR Review;Apr67, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p363 

    Before 1935, most employees in effect were prevented from engaging in union activity and collective bargaining. They had the theoretical right to do so, but the employer could easily fire or otherwise penalize those employees who had the temerity to exercise the right. In the mass-production...

  • National Labor Law Institute Scheduled.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr70, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p248 

    This article reports on the current issues in equal employment and discrimination, U.S. National Labor Relations Board matters and collective bargaining that will be discussed by a a nationally prominent faculty at The National Labor Law Institute on May 14 and 15, 1970 in Chicago, Illinois. The...

  • Collective Bargaining and Employee Participation: An Anomalous Interpretation of the National Labor Relations Act. Lee, Barbara A. // Labor Law Journal;May87, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p274 

    The article examines the coexistence between collective bargaining and employee participation under the National Labor Relations Act in the United States. Special labor relations problems arise when professionals are employed by organizations with bureaucratic structures. The structure of...

  • Appeals to Employees Are Legitimate.  // Labor Law Journal;Nov84, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p674 

    This article reports on the finding of the U.S. National Labor Relations Board that a successor employer's appeal to the employees to see through without a union was lawful. Rather than finding implied promises of threats, as had the administrative law judge, the board majority thought it was...

  • Decertification Petition Does Not Affect Presumptive Majority.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep73, Vol. 24 Issue 9, p644 

    The article reports that a decertification petition by a group of employees does not affect the presumption of a continuing union majority status in the United States. The National Labor Relations agreed with the Administrative Judge that a card-based bargaining order was proper in view of the...

  • Drug Testing Issues.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep89, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p603 

    The article reports on issues concerning drug testing policy in the United States. The National Labor Relations Board ruled that drug and alcohol testing of current employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining. It is unlawful for an employer to implement a unilateral testing policy for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics