TITLE

Why We Are Falling Behind

PUB. DATE
February 1941
SOURCE
New Republic;2/17/41, Vol. 104 Issue 7, p232
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the defense system of the United States. Reasons for less production of armaments in the U.S.; Indictment of the Aluminium Company of America, Alcoa Inc., for conspiring with a German monopoly; Lack of magnesium, vital for armament production, due to refusal of Alcoa to produce it or to allow others to produce it; Need for new factories to produce armaments for defense; Information on a plan for financing plant expansion; Information on Walter Reuther, director of the General Motors department of the union, and his plan to put idle men and machines to producing aircraft needed for defense; Significance of Reuther's plan.
ACCESSION #
14704113

 

Related Articles

  • Aerospace Expo 2002 Will Examine Strategies for Success. Rosenberg, Barry // Aviation Week & Space Technology;9/16/2002, Vol. 157 Issue 12, ON SITE. pS1 

    Highlights the Aerospace Expo 2002 to examine strategies for the success of the companies in the U.S. Features of the event; Presentation of the annual Technology Innovation Awards; Accounts on the critical issues on technical readiness and leadership.

  • REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY AND INVESTMENT: EVIDENCE FROM ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT. Bittlingmayer, George // CATO Journal;Winter2001, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p295 

    Discusses antitrust enforcement in the United States (U.S.) and its link to investment. Factors that drive investment activity; Risks posed by political uncertainty to investment in the U.S.; Business practices affected by antitrust policy, such as mergers and stock ownership; Historical...

  • E-Legal or Illegal? Peters, Dean E. // Gases & Welding Distributor;Sep/Oct2000, Vol. 44 Issue 5, p4 

    Editorial. Comments on the legal issues related to the use of the Internet as a tool of United States business enterprises to facilitate transactions. Antitrust implications of Internet data access; Reluctance of some firms to sell over the Internet; Ownership of databases.

  • PANEL DISCUSSION.  // Antitrust Law Journal;1969, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p148 

    Presents a panel discussion on antitrust law in the United States. Limitation on the relief of the line of commerce; Essence on the competition of the company; Application on the correct criteria of the failing company.

  • LUNCHEON ADDRESS: THE MARKETER AND ANTITRUST. Kotler, Philip // Antitrust Law Journal;1980, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p489 

    Focuses on the competitive strategy of business firms in the U.S. Examination of military theory; Observation of the market share and rank; Conflicts between antitrust law and the building of U.S. global companies.

  • Ignorance of EEC antitrust laws could be costly for American firms. Lang, John Temple // Management Review;Apr83, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p32 

    Discusses the impact of ignorance of European Economic Community antitrust laws on U.S.-based business enterprises. Concept of triple damage actions; Interlocutory injunction for protection of victims of apparent violations of antitrust laws; Regulation against agreements that restrict or...

  • We Must Have Big Corporations, So Why Try Them for Size? Driver, L. Robert // Saturday Evening Post;1/7/1950, Vol. 222 Issue 28, p10 

    The article comments on the antitrust suits against big corporations in the U.S. According to the author, several antitrust suits have often regarded the bigness of a corporation as a crime. The largest private corporation in the U.S. is the American Telephone and Telegraph Company during the...

  • ARE COSTS PRESUMPTIVELY UNRELIABLE INA COLLUSIVE MARKET? McKinney, Luther C. // Business Lawyer;Apr68, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p713 

    Discusses the effects of inflation on profit. Violation of antitrust laws; Concept of tainted cost theory; Application of the theory in the case between the United States versus Aluminum Co. of America.

  • As tougher audits begin, firms must grin, bear it.  // Crain's Chicago Business;4/8/2002, Vol. 25 Issue 14, p10 

    Focuses on the relationship between corporate executives and auditors in the U.S. Indictment of Arthur Andersen and Co. for its role in the Enron Corp. scandal; Responsibilities of auditors to evaluate corporate financial statements; Suggestion for auditors to stick on strict, by-the-book...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics