TITLE

Lords ruling clarifies unfair dismissal law -- but employers won't get away with bullying says Croner Consulting

PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
Management Services;Oct2004, Vol. 48 Issue 10, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article deals with the ruling issued by the British House of Lords in 2004 which awarded compensation for injury for employees in unfair dismissal cases. The ruling affects the amount of compensation that can be awarded in unfair dismissal cases. Employers will still be liable to pay compensation in these cases but the decision clarifies that they are not liable for additional compensation for injury to feelings, which is difficult to assess. This is actually good news for employers because until today the law was unclear as to whether the mental effects of bullying could be interpreted as recoverable in unfair dismissal cases. This ruling clearly states that the Employment Rights Act 1996 allows tribunals to award only financial losses in unfair dismissal cases. This also provides the much needed distinction that additional compensation for injury to feelings may only be awarded when the case involves discrimination by the employer. In the absence of discrimination then it is purely an unfair dismissal claim, with no injury to feelings award possible. However, the British House of Lords decision does not mean that employers can avoid tackling the issue of bullying in the workplace.
ACCESSION #
14696558

 

Related Articles

  • A DELICATE BALANCE. Campbell, Greg // People Management;5/4/2006, Vol. 12 Issue 9, p21 

    The article focuses on legal issues concerning the compensation of unfairly dismissed employees in Great Britain. A fair and transparent dismissal process is considered an important part of employment law. Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, compensation for unfair dismissal is defined as an...

  • USE CAUTION: AVOID WRONGFUL DISCHARGE, A COSTING APPROACH. NIMNICHT, JAMES L.; FRANZ, WOLFGANG W.; PIGEON, NANCY GRABER // Journal of Individual Employment Rights;2003-2004, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p39 

    Using the framework of employee turnover, this article first discusses wrongful discharge and then attempts to provide a detailed path that may be used to determine likely economic and noneconomic costs associated with a charge of wrongful termination. The types of economic losses that are...

  • Firing an Employee-Who's in Jail. Miklave, Matthew T.; Trafimow, A. Jonathan; Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E. // Workforce;Sep2002, Vol. 81 Issue 9, p98 

    Answers several questions related to personnel management and labor policy. Employer's obligation on an employee who is in prison; Overview of a company decision in terminating an employee for dishonesty about her pregnancy; Concerns over the plan of a company to implement a non-smoking policy....

  • 7th Circuit Upholds Discharge in Email Harassment Case. Kolodny, Steve // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2007, p149 

    The article reports on the rejection of an appeal in the case of "Bernier v. Morningstar, Inc." involving an employee fired for actions he took in response to perceived sexual harassment from a gay coworker. Instead of following proper reporting procedures, the employee sent an anonymous message...

  • facts and figures.  // Employers Law;May2014, p26 

    Charts are presented that show employment law and facts in Great Britain including the qualifying period, compensation limits and claim-filing deadline for situations such as unfair dismissal, statutory maternity pay, and breach of contract, redundancy pay calculation, and the number of claims...

  • The Language of Harassment. DeVeney, Jeannie; Britt, Spencer Fane // SGB;Dec2008, Vol. 41 Issue 12, p30 

    The article focuses on issues regarding sexual harassment policies in the workplace. It notes that employers' strict approaches regarding harassment laws may result into misinterpretations among the employees particularly the consideration of minor indiscretions as illegal harassment. It...

  • The Current Status of the Doctrine of Employment-At-Will. Hames, David S. // Labor Law Journal;Jan88, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p19 

    The article attempts to enhance understanding of the status of the doctrine of employment-at-will in the United States. Ever since the industrial revolution gave rise to large organizations and superior-subordinate relationships, achieving the proper balance between employers' rights to manage...

  • Fair selection. Choudry, Naeema // Commercial Motor;9/27/2007, Vol. 206 Issue 5248, p42 

    The article focuses on redundancy. Handling redundancies is a complex process which often involves difficult decisions. Employers who get it wrong risk costly claims for unfair dismissal or discrimination. The regulations apply where an employer is making more than 20 redundancies in a 90-day...

  • Legal Q&A... extreme political views.  // Personnel Today;12/2/2008, p14 

    The article presents questions and answers related to employment law, which include potential consequences if an employer dismisses an employee revealed to be a member of an extremist political organisation, compensation an employee receives on unfair dismissal, and whether employee can be...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics