TITLE

The Supreme Court Today

AUTHOR(S)
Pekelis, Alexander H.
PUB. DATE
April 1944
SOURCE
New Republic;4/17/44, Vol. 110 Issue 16, p522
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the Federal judiciary led by the U.S. Supreme Court that may prove to be the most liberal of the three branches of the national government. Negative effect of impairment of the Court's position in the national life on those who attack it and to those who fail to defend it; Destruction of the Court's authority and prestige due to disagreement of the Justices of the Court on vital issues; Perception of various appointees to the Court on application of social philosophy in their decisions.
ACCESSION #
14673206

 

Related Articles

  • The Supreme Court Is the Rehniquist Court activist?  // ABA Journal;Aug90, Vol. 76 Issue 8, p32 

    Comments on the agenda of the U.S. Supreme Court. Judicial activism; Judicial conservatism; Policy implications on judicial processes and the justice system.

  • The Supreme Court Rules. Uhlmann, Michael M. // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Oct2003, Issue 136, p26 

    Comments on the issues related to the judicial system practiced by the U.S. Supreme Court. Opinion of professor Alexander Bickel on the judicial review practiced by the Warren Court; Constitutional propriety of the New Deal revolution; Role of Justices.

  • The Supreme Court of the United States.  // Congressional Digest;Feb24, Vol. 3 Issue 5, p170 

    Presents decisions of national interest from the United States Supreme Court as of February 1924. Missouri Branch Bank case; New York Sugar Exchange case; Window Glass Workers Case.

  • The Supreme Court of the United States.  // Congressional Digest;Nov23, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p67 

    Presents updates at the United States Supreme Court as of November 1923. Decisions in cases; Court opinion on cropping contracts and attempts by ineligible citizens to acquire stock in companies.

  • JUDICIAL BRANCH.  // United States Government Manual;2003/2004, p67 

    Provides information on the U.S. Judicial Branch. Members and officers of the Supreme Court as of June 2003; Responsibilities of the court of appeals; Development of district courts in the territories of Guam and the Virgin Islands.

  • Here we go again. Kirsley, Michael // New Republic;8/13/90, Vol. 203 Issue 7, p6 

    Defines terms and phrases commonly used in discussions regarding United States Supreme Court nominees' views on constitutional issues. Advice and consent; Ideology; Conservative; Election returns; Fifth Amendment; Judicial activism and judicial restraint; Original intent; Philosophy.

  • Here we go again. Kirsley, Michael // New Republic;8/13/90, Vol. 203 Issue 7, p6 

    Defines terms and phrases commonly used in discussions regarding United States Supreme Court nominees' views on constitutional issues. Advice and consent; Ideology; Conservative; Election returns; Fifth Amendment; Judicial activism and judicial restraint; Original intent; Philosophy.

  • Here we go again. Kirsley, Michael // New Republic;8/13/90, Vol. 203 Issue 7, p6 

    Defines terms and phrases commonly used in discussions regarding United States Supreme Court nominees' views on constitutional issues. Advice and consent; Ideology; Conservative; Election returns; Fifth Amendment; Judicial activism and judicial restraint; Original intent; Philosophy.

  • Is the Proposal to "Curb" Powers of Supreme Court Sound? Con. Sutherland, George // Congressional Digest;Jun23, Vol. 2 Issue 9, p272 

    Presents arguments by George Sutherland, Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, opposing the proposal to reduce the powers of the U.S. Supreme court. Chief value of the written Constitution; Arguments against denouncement of the exercise of the power as judicial usurpation; Author's...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics