TITLE

MAKING THE CASE FOR MORAL HYPOCRISY

AUTHOR(S)
Neuhaus, Richard John
PUB. DATE
January 1999
SOURCE
First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jan1999, Issue 89, p66
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the debate about abortion and the moral hypocrisy of people who claim to be pro-choice. Author Cynthia Gorney's views on abortion and pro-abortion organizations; Controversy concerning the Supreme Court case `Roe v. Wade'; Technology of abortion.
ACCESSION #
1465047

 

Related Articles

  • Law, Religion, and the Metaphysics of Abortion: A Reply to Simmons. Beckwith, Francis J. // Journal of Church & State;Winter2001, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p19 

    Argues that the nature of the abortion debate is such that all positions on abortion presuppose some metaphysical point of view. Metaphysics of abortion; Criticism against the viability standard proposed by the United States Supreme Court in Roe versus Wade; Moral aspects of abortion.

  • Clinton wrong on partial-birth abortions. Gallagher, Maggie // Human Events;5/10/96, Vol. 52 Issue 18, p11 

    Criticizes United States President Bill Clinton's decision to veto a bill that would have banned partial-birth abortions. Supreme Court's ruling on `Roe v. Wade'; Eyewitness account of partial-birth abortion.

  • Ethics Expert Available on Abortion Debate As 31st Anniversary of Roe v. Wade Approaches.  // Ascribe Newswire: Medicine;1/22/2004, p7 

    As the 31st anniversary of Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court case approaches on January 22, 2004 ethicist N. Ann Davis, a professor of philosophy and the McConnell professor of Human Relations at Pomona College, Claremont, California is available to discuss today's biggest challenges to the...

  • Overturning Roe in a Heartbeat. Roden, Gregory J. // Human Life Review;Winter/Spring2009, Vol. 35 Issue 1/2, p101 

    The article discusses the debate in the pro-life movement based on the 2007 Supreme Court Gonzales v. Carhart decision in the U.S. It notes that the decision upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003. It discusses the issue of where does life begin in the Roe v. Wade decision. Issues...

  • America Deserves Better. Goldkamp, Richard // Human Life Review;Fall2009, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p41 

    The article offers the author's view on media bias in the news coverage of abortion and other sanctity-of-life issues in the U.S. He states that a certain degree of bias belongs in journalism. He cites the court decision of the Roe v. Wade supreme court case that made abortion a major national...

  • An Enduring Wrong.  // National Review;2/11/2013, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p18 

    The article looks at abortion policy in the U.S. as of January 2013. It notes that the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade did not bring an end to disputes and controversies in the U.S. on the issue. It expresses the view that abortion is evil and offers encouragement to the pro-life...

  • Faith in Hiding: Are There Secular Grounds for Banning Abortion? Clark, Thomas W. // Humanist;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 67 Issue 4, p27 

    This article discusses secular reasons for banning abortion. The author argues that religious views should not influence legislation. The U.S. Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade established a woman's right to an abortion and protects the legality of abortions in cases where a woman's life is under...

  • A Public Misinformation Campaign: The US Bishops are Unusually Shy About Their Involvement in an Antiabortion Campaign.  // Conscience: The News Journal of Catholic Opinion;Spring2008, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p36 

    This article discusses the antichoice, or pro-life, movement's poster campaign, specifically the poster campaign on Washington, D.C. bus lines. The article speculates that the aim of this poster campaign is to mislead the public about the specifics of the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade. The...

  • ROE'S ARMY RELOADS. Rosenberg, Debra // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);8/8/2005 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 146 Issue 5, p24 

    Looks at the current status of the pro-choice movement and its position in the nomination hearings for U.S. President George W. Bush's Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts. Concern by pro-choice advocates that Roberts is the swing vote that could topple "Roe v. Wade"; Comments from NARAL...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics