TITLE

From the Editors

AUTHOR(S)
Heeger, Robert; Musschenga, Albert W.
PUB. DATE
June 2004
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Jun2004, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p227
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduces the articles on ethical theory and moral practice featured in the June 2004 issue of the journal "Ethical Theory and Moral Practice." Concept of consequentialism; Discussion on how to respect the autonomy of incompetent patients; Moral obligation of people to prevent something bad from happening.
ACCESSION #
14579018

 

Related Articles

  • Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. McElwee, Brian // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Aug2011, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p457 

    Consequentialism is often charged with demandingness objections which arise in response to the theory's commitment to impartiality. It might be thought that the only way that consequentialists can avoid such demandingness objections is by dropping their commitment to impartialism. However, I...

  • The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act-Utilitarianism. WOODARD, CHRISTOPHER // Utilitas;Jun2013, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p246 

    This article proposes a way of understanding Kantianism, act-utilitarianism and some other important ethical theories according to which they are all versions of the same kind of theory, sharing a common structure. I argue that this is a profitable way to understand the theories discussed. It is...

  • Objective consequentialism and the licensing dilemma. Andrić, Vuko // Philosophical Studies;Feb2013, Vol. 162 Issue 3, p547 

    Frank Jackson has put forward a famous thought experiment of a physician who has to decide on the correct treatment for her patient. Subjective consequentialism tells the physician to do what intuitively seems to be the right action, whereas objective consequentialism fails to guide the...

  • Machines as Moral Patients We Shouldn't Care About (Yet): The Interests and Welfare of Current Machines. Basl, John // Philosophy & Technology;Mar2014, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p79 

    In order to determine whether current (or future) machines have a welfare that we as agents ought to take into account in our moral deliberations, we must determine which capacities give rise to interests and whether current machines have those capacities. After developing an account of moral...

  • Structures of normative theories. Dreier, James // Monist;Jan93, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p22 

    Addresses the questions about the agent neutral/agent centered distinction. Consequentializing strategy; Stigma of consequentialism; Kinds of metaethical theory; Metaethical justifications and normative structure; Ideal observer theories; Contract theories; Virtue ethics; How moral theory...

  • Deontology and agency. McNaughton, David; Rawling, Piers // Monist;Jan93, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p81 

    Advocates an agent-relative characterization of constraints. Agent-focused rationale for constraints; Agent-focused/agent-relativity; Consequentialism; Agent-relative (AR); Agent-neutral (AN); Contrasts between patient/victim-focused and agent-focused; Principle of (Im)Permissible Harm (PI/PH).

  • Parfit's Repugnant conclusion. Ryberg, Jesper // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr96, Vol. 46 Issue 183, p201 

    Criticizes an argument that tried to disclose an analytical shortcoming in consequentialist reasoning. Anti-consequentialist line of reasoning; Accommodation of the S principle; Why critics of consequentialism may advert to the analytical failings of consequentialist doctrines; John Finnis'...

  • The duty to do the best for one's patient. Crisp, Roger // Journal of Medical Ethics;Mar2015, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p220 

    This paper is a discussion of the duty of doctors to do what is best for their patients. What is required by this duty is shown to depend on the circumstances, including any financial constraints on the doctor. The duty to do the best is a duty of benevolence, and this virtue itself has to be...

  • UTI volume 24 issue 1 Cover and Front matter.  // Utilitas;Mar2012, Vol. 24 Issue 1, pf1 

    The article discusses facts about the journal. It states that the juornal is the first interdisciplinary periodical of moral and political philosophy, economic theory, jurisprudence, and intellectual history. It notes that the journal is supported by the International Society for Utilitarian...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics