TITLE

Appeals Court Allows Seattle Monorail Question to Go Before Voters

AUTHOR(S)
Kelemen, Jasmina
PUB. DATE
September 2004
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;9/16/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31970, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the ruling of the Washington State Court of Appeals that allows voters to decide if they want to halt Seattle Monorail Project. Appeal of the Monorail Project officials to the state Supreme Court; Statement of Natasha Jones, communications manager for the monorail district, regarding the ruling; Plan of the Monorail Project officials to move forward with the development plans.
ACCESSION #
14527461

 

Related Articles

  • Probation Eligibility.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Nov/Dec2013, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p87 

    The article presents the case United States vs. Jacob where the court ruled that if a convicted offender with a pending appeal fails to report to prison at a specified date, the dismissal of the appeals is then warranted by the disentitlement doctrine.

  • Complaining About Client's Discrimination Is Protected. Wilbur, Michael E. // HR Magazine;May2005, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p107 

    Focuses on the ruling of the case Flowers versus Columbia College of Chicago filed at the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in the U.S. on February 7, 2005, which held that an employer that fires an employee for complaining about discrimination by another entity violates the Title VII statute. ...

  • PILLOW FIGHT. Bassett, Michael // Corporate Meetings & Incentives;May2008, Vol. 27 Issue 5, p16 

    The article reports on the judgment given to Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort by the New Jersey appellate court for violating the Consumer Fraud Act. The court ordered a $200,000 payment for Onyx Acceptance Corp. for failing to provide 60 rooms for a corporate holiday party in December 2001....

  • Ohio Court of Appeals Rejects Claim that Mailing of Notice of Appeal Satisfies Mandatory Appeal Requirements. Shambaugh, Phyllis J. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q1, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Sixth District Court of Appeals in Lucas County to reject a taxpayer's claim that the timely mailing of a notice to appeal to the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals satisfies the mandatory appeal requirements of RC 5717.01. Long standing Ohio precedent that...

  • Appeals court upholds $72M judgment against Hilbert. Donhardt, Tracy // Indianapolis Business Journal;11/14/2005, Vol. 26 Issue 36, p45 

    The article reports on the 72 million dollars judgment upheld by the Indiana Court of Appeals against Stephen Hilbert, founder of Conseco Inc. in Indianapolis, Indiana.

  • Order Compelling Arbitration Not Appealable.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Jun1995, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p88 

    Reviews the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on a case regarding the appeal of an order compelling arbitration. Facts of the case; Provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act regarding an order favoring arbitration.

  • Refusal to Vacate Award of Interim Security Is Appealable.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Apr-Jun1995, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p91 

    Reviews the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on a case upholding the appealability of a final decision refusing to vacate an arbitral award of interim security pending arbitration. Facts of the case; Jurisdiction of a district court in hearing a petition to vacate...

  • Lambda to appeal makeup case. Conkin, Dennis // Bay Area Reporter;1/27/2005, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p10 

    Reports on the request of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund Inc. for the U.S. Court of Appeals to review a ruling by a three-judge appellate panel on the discrimination case of Darlene Jespersen. Belief of the defense on the possible rehearing of the lawsuit; Criticism of the defense...

  • Pain and Dizziness Not Disability. Peikes, Lawrence; Burns, Meghan D. // HR Magazine;May2005, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p108 

    Reports on the ruling of the case Guzman-Rosario versus United Parcel Service Inc. at the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in the U.S. on February 3, 2005, which focused on the disabilities covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act. Background of the case; Allegations made by plaintiff Abigail...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics