TITLE

Evidence on peer review--scientific quality control or smokescreen?

AUTHOR(S)
Goldbeck-Wood, Sandra
PUB. DATE
January 1999
SOURCE
BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);01/02/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7175, p44
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the importance of the scientific quality control process in peer review. Information on peer review process; Beneficiaries of the peer review system; Speculations on quality review; Major challenges in the process.
ACCESSION #
1447348

 

Related Articles

  • Improving `medical necessity' acceptance by health care providers and consumers. Hepps, S.A. // Physician Executive;Jul1994, Vol. 20 Issue 7, p22 

    Discusses the need for health care providers and consumers to accept negative authorization decisions when principles of continuous quality improvement are implemented on the authorization process. Problems brought about by the establishment of peer review and authorization agency medical...

  • Peer reviewing -- principles and practice. Baker, Michael J. // Marketing Review;Spring2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p25 

    As a result of developments in information technology (IT), major changes are taking place in the way in which we communicate with one another and the quantity of information available. The publication of the results of academic research has not escaped these changes and moves to publication...

  • QI brings improvements in Medicare.  // Family Practice Management;May1999, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p21 

    Highlights findings of a research on medical care quality improvement projects. Effectiveness of Medicare peer-review organizations in decreasing costs and improving care provided to Medicare beneficiaries; Health Care Financing Administration's financing of quality improvement organizations.

  • Peer Assessment of Accounting Practice. Gabriel, E. Ann; Roberts, Glenn A.; Stephens, Ray G. // Ohio CPA Journal;Apr-Jun2002, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p44 

    Focuses on the evolution of peer review of accounting firms in the U.S. Emphasis of a system review on the quality control of firms performing audits; Focus of an engagement review on specific engagements and related financial statements (FS); Intention of a report review to improve FS and...

  • Royal Society investigates how research results are made public.  // Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association;9/6/2003, Vol. 153 Issue 10, p282 

    Reports on the launch of the investigation into the ways scientific research results are made public. Controversy on how and when scientists communicate findings; Query on the need for internal checks prior to publication; Creation of a working group to examine the criticisms of the peer review...

  • Out with peer review.  // Cancer Nursing Practice;Sep2011, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p9 

    In this article the authors discuss the origin of peer review in 1990s, and the need for sufficient evidence to ensure the standards set by the peer review guidelines are met. They state that this process is bulky and unusable, and uses an undue amount of funds, and not to mention, it is...

  • Report: Peer groups save Medicare millions.  // AHA News;02/22/99, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p7 

    Focuses on the findings of a report by the American Health Quality Association which showed the financial benefits of projects by peer review organizations. Overall value of money that was saved from the projects; Decrease in unnecessary heart procedures.

  • The Dynamics Within Peer Review. Loevy, Hannelore // Pediatric Dentistry;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p374 

    The author reflects on the peer review process. She states that the journal selects reviewers for their scientific rigor so to ensure the scientific merit and quality of the published papers. She mentions that reviewers often have differing opinions on submitted papers and that the editor is the...

  • SECRETS TO A SUCCESSFUL ON-SITE PEER REVIEW. Nowicki, Raymond M. // CPA Journal;Oct2000, Vol. 70 Issue 10, p14 

    Discusses the techniques used by leading accounting firms for successful peer reviews. Establishment of a desire to achieve quality; Development of a quality control system; Standards covered by a peer review system. INSET: AICPA CHANGES PEER REVIEWS FOR SMALL FIRMS.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics