TITLE

WASHINGTON WIRE

PUB. DATE
June 1952
SOURCE
New Republic;6/9/52, Vol. 126 Issue 23, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on various political developments in the U.S. as of June 9, 1952. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision rejecting the seizure of steel mills has precipitated an ugly crisis. The decision does not effect the equities of the workers' original position. The U.S. Wage Stabilization Board found the union demands justified. Great Britain is over-extended outside Europe and will need more help. This means that the U.S. must put up more money; or there must be a further stretch-out of the democracies' rearmament program; or there will be a breakdown in containment in Asia or Europe.
ACCESSION #
14459655

 

Related Articles

  • The Evolution of Search-and-Seizure Law: How New Hampshire and Federal Law Differ. Lawrence, Randall // Inquiry (University of New Hampshire);Spring2010, p30 

    The article discusses findings of a study on the impact of U.S. Supreme Court decisions on search-and-seizure law, and the changes it has caused on the criminal justice system in New Hampshire. The author elaborates on the history of modern search-and-seizure law, examines the differences...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THE RIGHT OF GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATORS TO INTERVIEW AND EXAMINE ALLEGED VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE OR NEGLECT. Baxter, Teri Dobbins // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Oct2012, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p125 

    The article presents information on the issues related to child abuse and neglect in the U.S. and the challenges faced by the parents or guardians. The lack of federal constitutional boundaries for the searches and seizures based on this issue and the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in this...

  • The Supreme Court. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;2/26/2014, pA02 

    The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that police may enter and search a home without a warrant as long as 1 person inside agrees, even if another occupant disagrees.

  • Supreme Court Justices as Human Decision Makers: An Individual-Level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases. Segal, Jeffrey A. // Journal of Politics;Nov86, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p938 

    Analyzes the search and seizure decisions of the justices of the United States Supreme Court through a fact model of their decision-making. Search and seizure cases decided through June 1981 by Justices Stewart, White, Powell and Stevens; Variables that influenced the justices' decision-making;...

  • Precedents. Curriden, Mark // ABA Journal;Jun2013, Vol. 99 Issue 6, p72 

    The article focuses on revolution created in the criminal justice system od the U.S. and discusses a precedent in this context which involved police raiding Dollree Mapp's suburban Cleveland home seeking evidence for making bomb and charging her for another offense of possession of obscene...

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--PROTECTION AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE: THE INADEQUACIES OF USING AN ANONYMOUS TIP TO PROVIDE REASONABLE SUSPICION FOR AN INVESTIGATORY STOP. Shifrin, Orrin S. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1991, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p760 

    This article analyzes the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Alabama v. White involving protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The Court held that under the totality of the circumstances approach, an anonymous tip exhibited sufficient indicia of reliability to provide the...

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--ELIMINATING THE INADVERTENT DISCOVERY REQUIREMENT FOR SEIZURES UNDER THE PLAIN VIEW DOCTRINE. Hall, Richard J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1991, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p819 

    This article discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Horton v. California involving the elimination of the inadvertent discovery requirement for seizures under the plain view doctrine. The Court held that inadvertent discovery is not required for a seizure of evidence under...

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--PROTECTIVE SWEEP DOCTRINE: WHEN DOES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT ALLOW POLICE OFFICERS TO SEARCH THE HOME INCIDENT TO A LAWFUL ARREST? Sifferlen, Mark J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1991, Vol. 81 Issue 4, p862 

    This article discusses the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Maryland v. Buie involving protective sweep doctrine. The Court held that the fourth amendment permits an officer executing an arrest warrant in a private dwelling to search rooms other than the room in which the arrest is...

  • SEARCH AND SEIZURE.  // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Dec1975, Vol. 66 Issue 4, p436 

    This article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision on four fourth amendment cases dealing with stops and searches by immigration authorities near, but not directly at, the U.S. border. Continuing an approach taken two years earlier in 1973, the Court's decision in United States versus Ortiz...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics