Washington Wire

February 1955
New Republic;2/28/55, Vol. 132 Issue 9, p2
The article presents information on political situation of the U.S. There has been a substantial and encouraging improvement in Washington climate. People are talking more rationally about subversives, atom bombs, China and Russia. People are frequently startled by the comment of a friend that would have been ranked as heresy a year ago. It may be too early to say it, but America seems to be slowly returning to reality alter the binge of the century. And the Administration has spunked up courage to tell the awful truth about the fallout from the H-bomb blanket.


Related Articles

  • Pentagon report: Failed U.S. diplomacy has emboldened North Korea.  // East-Asia-Intel Reports;1/16/2009, p11 

    The article focuses on the criticism of the U.S. policy of holding multi-nation talks on North Korea's nuclear program by a Pentagon study group on U.S. nuclear weapons shortfalls. James Schlesinger, Central Intelligence Agency director, said that North Korea has fewer fears of a nuclear...

  • NUCLEAR WEAPONS: STRATEGIC OR TACTICAL? Brodie, Bernard // Foreign Affairs;Jan1954, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p217 

    This article expresses the author's views on the military policy of the U.S. government during the Cold War period. The author relates that the total amount spent by the U.S. government on the atomic energy program from the beginning until June 30, 1952 was eight billion dollars, and that the...

  • Project East River-Survival in the Atomic Age. McLean, Joseph E. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep1953, Vol. 9 Issue 7, p247 

    The article reports on the purposes and findings of Project East River (PER). This project is a study of United States' vulnerability to atomic assault and the measures to be undertaken subsidized by the government to reduce threat to the country. PER sets out its basic notion that the civil...

  • ATOMIC WEAPONS AND AMERICAN POLICY. Oppenheimer, J. Robert // Foreign Affairs;Jul1953, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p525 

    It is possible that in the large light of history, the atomic bomb will appear not very different than in the bright light of the first atomic explosion. Partly because of the mood of the time, partly because of a very clear prevision of what the technical developments would be, people had the...

  • Feds of the Future. Shoop, Tom // Government Executive;Mar/Apr2014, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p4 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including hypothetical agency in the U.S., people who will be running the agencies of the future, and federal workplace of the future.

  • Seven Years Ago We Talked of Building A-Bomb Plants in Russia!  // Saturday Evening Post;12/12/1953, Vol. 226 Issue 24, p10 

    The article focuses on the American and Russian's international control of atomic energy . A systematic plan governing the operations and property of the atomic development is necessary for both countries to ensure the use of atomic energy for peaceful purposes, and for the elimination from...

  • Toward a nuclear weapon-free world. Meyer, Paul // Ploughshares Monitor;Autumn2014, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p18 

    The article offers information on the oppositions for nuclear weapons in Canada. It discusses the effort of Canadian administration to conduct antinuclear initiatives and alleviate acquisitions of nuclear weapons such as atomic bombs. Also mentioned the link of North Atlantic Treaty Organization...

  • MILITARY POLICY AND DEFENSE OF THE "GREY AREAS" Kissinger, Henry A. // Foreign Affairs;Apr1955, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p416 

    This article expresses the author's views on the military policy of the U.S. government. The author expresses that postulates of American strategic thought amount to the assertion that the chief deterrent to Soviet aggression resides in U.S. nuclear superiority. The corollary is that the U.S....

  • No Magic Bullet on Iran Gvosdev, Nikolas // World Politics Review;2/26/2010, p1 

    The article examines possible approaches towards Iranian nuclear policy. The author reiterates his previous conclusion that focusing on deterrence in the short run while increasing efforts to promote regime modification by internal means would be the most effective approach. He further asserts...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics