Seattle Monorail Plans to Sell Bonds Without Voters' OK

Kelemen, Jasmina
September 2004
Bond Buyer;09/17/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31971, p28
Trade Publication
The article reports on the intention of the Seattle Monorail Project to go ahead with plans to issue roughly $700 million to $800 million in bonds, despite the state's Court of Appeals ruling this week that the issue can be presented to voters in November, a move requested by groups opposed to the 14-mile line. Regardless of what voters decide in the upcoming election, the Monorail Project can still collect revenue from a vehicle tax that voters authorized in 2002 to finance the construction project.


Related Articles

  • Tax Cases: Advance Notes.  // Accountancy;Aug1966, Vol. 77 Issue 876, p583 

    This article focuses on the decision of the Court of Appeals on tax cases in Great Britain. In "Muir v. C.I.R.," the Court of Appeal has reversed the decision of J. Pennycuick, who held invalid the 1952 variation of a deed of settlement of 1947. In "Lawson v. Hosemaster Co. Ltd.," the Court of...

  • California Readies $15 Billion Sale With Minor Concern About Lawsuit. Williams, Rochelle // Bond Buyer;3/8/2004, Vol. 347 Issue 31836, p3 

    Focuses on the lawsuit filed on behalf of California cities against the State Board of Equalization, challenging the redirection of local sales tax revenue on the issuance of recovery bonds. Implication of the lawsuit to the cities; Facts of the case; Contention of the plaintiff.

  • Legal Challenge Delays Closing of Newton County, Ga.'s $38 Million Water Deal. DeSue, Tedra // Bond Buyer;9/3/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31962, p33 

    Focuses on the failure of Newtown County, Georgia to close water revenue bond deal. Impact of legal challenge filed by a citizen; Sale of bonds; Change in interest rates.

  • Okla. High Court Declines to Hear Anti-Bond Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/04/2000, Vol. 334 Issue 31029, p7 

    Reports the lifting of the case against blocking the bonds sale by the Oklahoma Capital Improvement Finance Authority following the Supreme Court refusal to hear the case in Oklahoma. Purpose of the hearing refusal; Reasons on the alleged unconstitutionality of the bond issues; Causes of the...

  • SOUTHWEST Bond-Watch. Watts, Jim; Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/14/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32029, p27 

    The article analyzes different bonds by southwestern States of United States. In Arizona Tucson Unified School District may allow businesses to advertise products and services on the district's school buses as a way to generate money for schools. A 2002 court order by the Arkansas Supreme Court...

  • Judge Issues Deadline for Dallas River Project Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/29/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31213, p40 

    Focuses on a lawsuit determining the legality of selling bonds for a project without the approval of the voters in Dallas, Texas. Schedule of the case trials set by judge Anne Ashby; Claims of the Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities over the illegality of the sale of the debt; Overview of the case.

  • Oklahoma Lawsuit Could Break $156 Million Bond Package. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;09/18/2000, Vol. 333 Issue 30977, p43 

    Focuses on the lawsuit filed by Representative Russ Roach against a revenue bond issue for state capital improvement plan in Oklahoma. Concern over industrial projects to be funded by bond proceeds; Contention on the illegality of the bond issue; Target date for the availability of funds.

  • Illinois probe of Chicago suburb could affect 1993 IDFA bonds. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;06/15/99, Vol. 328 Issue 30662, p28 

    Reports that the Illinois Attorney General's office has launched an investigation into whether Chicago, Illinois' decision not to pursue reimbursement for a lawsuit settlement violated the conditions of issuance. Revenue bonds issued by the Illinois Development Finance Authority.

  • Second Clinton Park Lawsuit Holds Up Other Arkansas Revenue Deals. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/3/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31195, p34 

    Reports on a lawsuit attacking the constitutionality of a 16 million dollar Little Rock, Arkansas bond sale. Postponement of other revenue bond issues in the state; Details of the lawsuit.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics