TITLE

Misunderstood Decision

PUB. DATE
May 1956
SOURCE
New Republic;5/7/56, Vol. 134 Issue 19, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the confusion created by the Supreme Court in the U.S. in connection with the Court's disposition of the South Carolina bus-segregation case. The Court's ruling was widely heralded as a decision that state laws requiring segregation by race on intrastate public transportation systems were unconstitutional whereas the Court merely dismissed the South Carolina case as improperly before it at this particular time. The Court of Appeals had sent the case back to the District Court for further proceedings.
ACCESSION #
14433530

 

Related Articles

  • Appellate court sends Ward v. Wilbanks back for jury trial.  // Counseling Today;Mar2012, Vol. 54 Issue 9, p75 

    The article reports that 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sends Ward v. Wilbanks case back to U.S. District court for a jury trial after its ruling on January 27, 2012.

  • Limitation of Liability Provision Includes to Telephone Company. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Aug2007, Vol. 37 Issue 8, p42 

    The article focuses on the decision of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida concerning the limitation of liability provision to a telephone company. The court stated that the limitation of liability clause between the insured alarm firm and phone company should also be applied...

  • PATENT WATCH.  // Nature Reviews Drug Discovery;Aug2007, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p594 

    The article offers news briefs related to court rulings on patent cases in the U.S. A U.S. district court has ruled that the supporting patent for the widely prescribed antithrombotic drug Plavix is valid. The U.S. Court of Appeals has announced an earlier district court decision ruling that...

  • Third Circuit Decision Limits Exemptions from Section 16 Liability. Bryer, Barry A.; Charish, Michael A.; Silk, David M.; Vizcarrondo Jr., Paul // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q1, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, concerning the Levy versus Sterling case that was filed in 2002. The appellate court reversed the district court's dismissal of a Section 16(b) lawsuit involving the pre-initial public offering stock...

  • Employees Regarded as Disabled Must Be Accommodated, Says Eleventh Circuit. Alvarez, Frank; Stanton, Diane E. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2005 Q4, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit which impacts the litigation of disability discrimination cases under the Florida Civil Rights Act. The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court in its decision that disability discrimination claims...

  • Lower Court Holding.  // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2006, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p37 

    The article provides information on the decision of the court of appeals regarding the case filed by the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR) against the Department of Defense concerning the Solomon Amendment in the U. S. When FAIR asked the U. S. District Court for the District of...

  • Commercial Law. Ross, Mike // Chartered Accountants Journal;May2001, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p44 

    Reports on New Zealand Court of Appeal decisions as of May 2001. Court's claim that a computer program installed on a hard drive is a document which if misused fraudulently can support a conviction under the Crimes Act 1961; Court's declaration that the acts and omissions of responsible staff...

  • The meaning of "totally without merit". Reynolds, Polly // Planner;Sep2014, p39 

    The article discusses a ruling by the Court of Appeal which held that the meaning of totally without merit (TWM) means no more and no less than "bound to fail" in the case of R (Grace) v. the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

  • A Look Back at the W.Va. Supreme Court's Last Few Terms. LANNOM, ANDREA // State Journal (WV);8/30/2013, Vol. 29 Issue 34, p1 

    The article looks on the changes in decisions at the West Virginia Supreme Court after the Rules of Appellate Procedure came into effect.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics