TITLE

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

AUTHOR(S)
An-Wen Chan; Krleza-Jeric, Karmela; Schmid, Isabelle; Altman, Douglas G.
PUB. DATE
September 2004
SOURCE
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;9/28/2004, Vol. 171 Issue 7, p735
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The reporting of outcomes within published randomized trials has previously been shown to be incomplete, biased and inconsistent with study protocols. We sought to determine whether outcome reporting bias would be present in a cohort of government-funded trials subjected to rigorous peer review. Methods: We compared protocols for randomized trials approved for funding by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (formerly the Medical Research Council of Canada) from 1990 to 1998 with subsequent reports of the trials identified in journal publications. Characteristics of reported and unreported outcomes were recorded from the protocols and publications. Incompletely reported outcomes were defined as those with insufficient data provided in publications for inclusion in meta-analyses. An overall odds ratio measuring the association between completeness of reporting and statistical significance was calculated stratified by trial. Finally, primary outcomes specified in trial protocols were compared with those reported in publications. Results: We identified 48 trials with 68 publications and 1402 outcomes. The median number of participants per trial was 299, and 44% of the trials were published in general medical journals. A median of 31% (10th-90th percentile range 5%-67%) of outcomes measured to assess the efficacy of an intervention (efficacy outcomes) and 59% (0%-100%) of those measured to assess the harm of an intervention (harm outcomes) per trial were incompletely reported. Statistically significant efficacy outcomes had a higher odds than nonsignificant efficacy outcomes of being fully reported (odds ratio 2.7; 95% confidence interval 1.5-5.0). Primary outcomes differed between protocols and publications for 40% of the trials. Interpretation: Selective reporting of outcomes frequently occurs in publications of high-quality government-funded trials.
ACCESSION #
14423678

 

Related Articles

  • Some frequently observed statistical errors in clinical trials: a short review. Jaykaran // Journal of Pharmacy Research;Jun2010, Vol. 3 Issue 6, p1367 

    Background: Quality of reporting of statistics in clinical trials published in Indian medical journals is poor. Published studies regarding the reporting of statistics in clinical trials published in Indian medical journals points to persistent statistical errors, flaws and deficiencies....

  • Putting Trials on the Record. Bjerklie, David // Time;7/5/2004, Vol. 164 Issue 1, p42 

    Discusses peer-reviewed journals that present clinical trials of drugs. Report that researchers who receive pharmaceutical industry funding do not necessarily get to decide whether the results are submitted for publication; Bias against negative or inconclusive data; Movement to require...

  • They're Dying to Get In. Bjerklie, David // Time;4/22/2002, Vol. 159 Issue 16, p56 

    Discusses the difficulty of being able to participate in clinical trials in medicine. Benefits of the trials, including substantial doctor-patient interaction; Idea that it is not just the terminally ill who benefit from the attention, but also medically neglected or poorly informed subjects...

  • CHAPTER 26: Design Principles and Their Application in Preventive Field Trials. Brown, C. Hendricks // Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention: Theory, Science, & Practice;2003, p523 

    The article provides a framework for assessing the quality of a preventive field trial. Such a framework is useful for three purposes. First, research scientists can direct their attention to a limited number of essential elements in designing and implementing new preventive trials. Second,...

  • How to Find a Trial. Smith, Ian K. // Time International (South Pacific Edition);11/22/99, Issue 47, p76 

    Offers information on patient enrollment in clinical drug trials. Researchers' need for patients as well as patients' need for treatment; Reasons adults do not participate in clinical drug trials; Where to locate trials. INSETS: Ace-ing It;Inside Information;Minitel Mini-Stroke;Couch Potatoes...

  • Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. Day, Simon J; Altman, Douglas G // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);08/19/2000, Vol. 321 Issue 7259, p504 

    Discusses the relevance of allocation concealment, or blinding, in clinical trial practice. Importance of blinding in trials when response criteria is subjective; Difficulties involved in conducting double blind trials; Risk of bias associated with inadequate blinding; Use of blinding in other...

  • Clinical Trial watch.  // Urology Times;1/1/2006, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p25 

    The article presents a list of clinical trials related to urology that were conducted in the U.S. In one of the trials Paciltaxel, Carboplatin and Gemcltabine are used for the Treatment of patients with Advanced Transitional Cell Cancer of the Bladder. In another trial researchers are studying...

  • Retaining Subjects Is Harder Than Recruiting Them. Engfer, Doug // Applied Clinical Trials;Oct2004, Vol. 13 Issue 10, p70 

    The article discusses the difficulty of retention in contrast with recruitment of subjects in clinical trials in the U.S. Percentage of retention rates and dropout rates; Potential benefits of improving retention; Importance of communication and education between the researcher and the subject;...

  • My Life as a Guinea Pig. Reno, Jamie // Newsweek;8/6/2001, Vol. 138 Issue 6, p42 

    Focuses on the author, who participated in a clinical trial that helped preserve him from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. His participation in a chemotherapy regimen called CHOP; His experiences in a clinical trial of a drug called Bexxar, which put him in remission; View that although clinical trials...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics