TITLE

A DIVIDED COURT IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE: THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE AND ITS DISTINCTIVE MODEL FOR JUDICIAL EFFICACY, 1997-2003

AUTHOR(S)
Feldman, Adam D.
PUB. DATE
February 2004
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2004, Vol. 67 Issue 3, p849
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Examines the separate opinions issued in divided cases by the justices of the Supreme Court of Delaware from 1997-2003. Attributes of the Delaware court system; Overview of the decisions of Delaware's high court from 1997-2003; Purpose of a prototypical high court study.
ACCESSION #
14419548

 

Related Articles

  • THE ABOLITION OF THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN AFRICA: A COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS. Novak, Andrew // Indiana International & Comparative Law Review;8/1/2012, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p267 

    The article presents a comparative constitutional analysis of the abolition of the mandatory death penalty in Africa. It also highlights the invalidation of mandatory death penalty in certain court cases of the U.S. and India and these decisions provide legal basis for the introduction of...

  • TREATING LIKE SUBDECISIONS ALIKE: THE SCOPE OF STARE DECISIS AS APPLIED TO JUDICIAL METHODOLOGY. Connors, Jordan Wilder // Columbia Law Review;Apr2008, Vol. 108 Issue 3, p681 

    The Supreme Court has explained that stare decisis binds the Court to both its result and "those portions of the opinion necessary to [the] result." Yet the Supreme Court does not seem to extend this principle to those "necessary portions," herein called subdecisions, that involve methodological...

  • Delaware Courts And The Business Judgment Rule. Holland, Randy J. // Corporate Board;Sep/Oct2008, Vol. 29 Issue 172, p1 

    For American corporate directors, legal judgments of how well they have performed their fiduciary duties most often end up in the Delaware court system. Although the process of being sued over your governance is never pleasant, the author, a Delaware Supreme Court justice, has some reassuring...

  • The Delaware Courts.  // NACD Directorship;Nov/Dec2014, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p54 

    The article discusses the Supreme Court of Delaware, several decision it made in 2014 and the composition of its judges including the Honorable Leo E. Strine Jr., Henry duPont Rigely and Randy J. Holland among others.

  • Delaware Supreme Court asked to hear lesbian custody case.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;12/29/2005, Issue 940, p28 

    The article reports on the request for Supreme Court to hear lesbian custody case in Delaware. Family Court Judge Mark Backworth ruled that as a "de facto parent," Susan Symes has standing to petition for custody of triplets born to Elizabeth Symes, who during their nine-year relationship...

  • SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE SUITS--Watts v. Des Moines Register and Tribune--Derivative Suits in Iowa: Filling a Hollow Guarantee with Adequate Safeguards.  // Journal of Corporation Law;Fall82, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p145 

    This article addresses the question of why the federal district court felt Iowa would enbrace the more stringent Zapata test rather then the traditional business judgment approach. First, a brief background of the business judgment rule in derivative litigation will add perspective to the...

  • Being Informed Does Matter: Fine Tuning Gross Negligence Twenty Plus Years After Van Gorkom. Sharfman, Bernard S. // Business Lawyer;Nov2006, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p135 

    This article first establishes that there are still a number of reasons why being informed does matter, despite the ability to incorporate an exculpation clause into a Delaware corporation's certificate of incorporation. This is followed by an explanation of how Delaware's business judgment rule...

  • Delaware Supreme Court Addresses Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2009 Q1, Special section p1 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Delaware Supreme Court in Gantler v. Stephens, which reverses the decision by the Chancery Court to dismiss a shareholder complaint alleging breaches of fiduciary duty against the directors and officers of a bank holding firm. One of the grounds in the...

  • Delaware Court Hinders Buyers From Locking Up Deals. Sikora, Martin // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;Jun2003, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p11 

    Reports on a ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court which suggests that an acquisition deal is not complete until it is officially declared closed by both sides. Implications of the decision for the merger and acquisition market; Limitations of the ruling; Factors to consider by clients who are...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics