NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T, PRIVACY AND SEARCH AND SEIZURE IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION: TRYING TO MAKE SENSE OUT OF A TANGLED MESS
- Hood's Understated Alteration of the Eleventh Amendment Landscape. Gerson, Leonard H. // DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal;Spring2005, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p437
Discusses the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. v. Hood, recognizing an Article I exception to its broad statement of a state's Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity in Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida. Explanation of the in rem exception to a state's sovereign...
- CLYDE TIMOTHY BUNKLEY v. FLORIDA: on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of florida
. // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Clyde Timothy Bunkley v. Florida, case number 02-8636, decided on May 27, 2003. On April 16, 1986, Bunkley burglarized the Western Sizzlin' Restaurant in Florida. After the police arrested him, they discovered a pocketknife folded in...
- The "Loss of Chance" Doctrine of Damages for Breach of Contract. Sturgess, Robert H. // Florida Bar Journal;Oct2005, Vol. 79 Issue 9, p29
The article summarizes the history of the loss of chance doctrine for breach of contract held by the Florida Supreme Court in 1984. Florida not only has accepted the doctrine outside the tort context, but also has expanded it beyond its Restatement of Contracts' foundation. In 1931 the U.S....
- Rethinking the Application of Contingency Risk Multipliers in Fee Awards Should Florida Courts Recede from Quanstrom? Leviten, Aaron; Olexa, Michael; Sheesley, Robert // Florida Bar Journal;Oct2005, Vol. 79 Issue 9, p75
The article presents information about Florida's foundational case on the risk multiplier, Standard Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So. 2d 828. In Quanstrom case, the Florida Supreme Court classified three kinds of cases in which a contingency fee multiplier might be appropriate. In...
- Unanimous Ruling By Florida Supreme Court Rejects 'Diminished Value' Claim. // Insurance Advocate;6/3/2002, Vol. 113 Issue 21, p10
Reports on the May 23, 2002 ruling of the Florida Supreme Court in the case Siegle vs. Progressive Consumers Insurance Co., in which it was determined that an insurance company's automobile insurance policy does not provide coverage for inherent diminished value.
- Selected recent court decisions. // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1998, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p499
Lists several recent court decisions in various lawsuits filed in the United States as of December 1998. Includes the cases `United States versus Bajakaijan'; `Kottle versus Northwest Kidney Centers'; `Arrington versus Wong.'
- Opinion of the Court. // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2006, Vol. 9 Issue 6, p188
An excerpt from the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in "Salim Ahmed Hamdan v. Donald Rumsfeld" is presented.
- Before the Court. // Supreme Court Debates;Sep2008, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p40
An excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court's April 16, 2008 decision in the case Larry Begay v. United States is presented.
- Follow up after bias complaint to make sure employee isn't experiencing retaliation. // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jul2011, Vol. 5 Issue 7, p3
The article examines a court decision in the case, McCarthy, et al., v. R.J. Reynolds, regarding the issues of bias complaint and retaliation in the U.S.