Legal Challenge Delays Closing of Newton County, Ga.'s $38 Million Water Deal

DeSue, Tedra
September 2004
Bond Buyer;9/3/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31962, p33
Trade Publication
Focuses on the failure of Newtown County, Georgia to close water revenue bond deal. Impact of legal challenge filed by a citizen; Sale of bonds; Change in interest rates.


Related Articles

  • Suit Halts Delivery of $33M of San Antonio Transit Bonds. Williamson, Richard // Bond Buyer;11/14/2013, Vol. 122 Issue 34012, p1 

    The article informs that lawsuit has halted delivery of 33 million dollars of bonds for VIA Advanced Transportation District of San Antonio that was priced October 17, 2013. It further highlights that the bonds had been scheduled for delivery in November 2013. It further discusses that district...

  • Wisconsin Teams With Bear Stearns. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;9/7/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31963, p1 

    The article reports that, Amid several examinations into how Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. won deals in Illinois and a Wisconsin county, the state of Wisconsin plans to use the firm as a co-senior manager on a $90 million to $100 million transportation revenue bond refunding that may price his week....

  • Ky. Court Passes On Key Case. DeSue, Tedra // Bond Buyer;8/21/2006, Vol. 357 Issue 32449, p1 

    The article reports that the Kentucky Supreme Court has declined to review a case in which the state's method of taxing interest on out-of-state bonds was found to be unconstitutional. Meanwhile, the state officials did not comment on the case. Furthermore, an attorney with Peck, Shaffer &...

  • Louisiana Official Says State Won't Sue Swap Counterparties. Watts, Jim // Bond Buyer;2/9/2009, Vol. 367 Issue 33058, p30 

    The article reports on the decision of Louisiana officials not to sue the counterparties involved in the forwarded floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement on the state's gasoline and fuel tax revenue bonds. Department of Administration commissioner Angèle Davis expresses that the...

  • Seattle Monorail Plans to Sell Bonds Without Voters' OK. Kelemen, Jasmina // Bond Buyer;09/17/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31971, p28 

    The article reports on the intention of the Seattle Monorail Project to go ahead with plans to issue roughly $700 million to $800 million in bonds, despite the state's Court of Appeals ruling this week that the issue can be presented to voters in November, a move requested by groups opposed to...

  • Rising Rates Make Georgia County Put Off $250M Water, Sewer Deal. DeSue, Tedra // Bond Buyer;4/13/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31861, p1 

    Reports that finance officials in Gwinnett County, Georgia have postponed the sale of $250 million in giltedged water and sewer revenue refunding bonds due to rising interest rates in April 2004. Reasons cited for the postponement; Goal of achieving net-present-value savings of at least three...

  • Oklahoma Lawsuit Could Break $156 Million Bond Package. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;09/18/2000, Vol. 333 Issue 30977, p43 

    Focuses on the lawsuit filed by Representative Russ Roach against a revenue bond issue for state capital improvement plan in Oklahoma. Concern over industrial projects to be funded by bond proceeds; Contention on the illegality of the bond issue; Target date for the availability of funds.

  • Okla. High Court Declines to Hear Anti-Bond Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;12/04/2000, Vol. 334 Issue 31029, p7 

    Reports the lifting of the case against blocking the bonds sale by the Oklahoma Capital Improvement Finance Authority following the Supreme Court refusal to hear the case in Oklahoma. Purpose of the hearing refusal; Reasons on the alleged unconstitutionality of the bond issues; Causes of the...

  • Judge Issues Deadline for Dallas River Project Case. Albanese, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;8/29/2001, Vol. 337 Issue 31213, p40 

    Focuses on a lawsuit determining the legality of selling bonds for a project without the approval of the voters in Dallas, Texas. Schedule of the case trials set by judge Anne Ashby; Claims of the Taxpayers for Sensible Priorities over the illegality of the sale of the debt; Overview of the case.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics