TITLE

Group Decisions: Promise and Pitfalls

AUTHOR(S)
Gautschi, T. F.
PUB. DATE
August 1991
SOURCE
Design News;8/26/91, Vol. 47 Issue 16, p304
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making. Advantage of the approach in identifying factors related to the decision; Benefit in reducing implementation time; Tendency to keep the debate process objective.
ACCESSION #
14044043

 

Related Articles

  • BETTER LAGGED THAN NEVER: THE LAGGED EFFECTS OF PROCESS INTERVENTIONS ON GROUP DECISIONS. FISHER, COLIN M. // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings;2010, Vol. 2010 Issue 1, p1 

    This study investigated three issues regarding process interventions in group decision making: (1) how process interventions affect group decision making processes and outcomes; (2) how persistent these effects are, and (3) how the timing (earlier vs. later) and type (directive vs....

  • Group decision-making--Part II. Gautschi, T. F. // Design News;9/17/90, Vol. 46 Issue 18, p180 

    The article focuses on the group decision making processes. Brainstorming and synectics are the two formalized decision making processes. Synectics is a variation of brainstorming, it keeps the participants unaware of the problem by using a key word or phrase. A brainstorming is a least formal...

  • Building Task Cohesion to Bring Teams Together. Knouse, Stephen B. // Quality Progress;Mar2007, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p49 

    The article shares the author's insights on the difference between a homogenous team and a more diverse team in promoting team effectiveness. The author cites that a homogenous team which is composed of members of the same gender or race will be more cohesive and will be more efficient in...

  • Contextural Correlates of R & D Team Collaborative Problem Solving. Dailey, R.; Morgan, C. // Management International Review;1979, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p77 

    The paper examines the relationships between Research & Development team collaborative problem solving and various theoretical predictors, team cohesiveness, task certainty, task interdependence, and team size. Collaborative problem solving can be defined as "the presence of mutual influence...

  • PARTICIPATIVE MULTIVARIATE DIFFERENTIATION TOWARD PURPOSEFULNESS. McKelvey, William W.; Kilmann, Ralph H. // Academy of Management Proceedings (0065-0668);1973, p489 

    The article reports on elements of organizational structure that can be altered to control costs. The authors focus on differentiation and integration within industrial organizations. It is suggested that organizations develop subsystems in an attempt to minimize costs and deal with issues of...

  • Brainstorm Business. Hartman, Taylor // Leadership Excellence;Feb2005, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p14 

    Examines the significance of brainstorming in helping work teams to come up with innovative ideas, products, services, and solutions. Evaluation of the personalities of employees that participates in brainstorming sessions; Ground rules in brainstorming sessions; Phases of brainstorming sessions.

  • Team decision making in the workplace: A systematic review of discourse analytic studies. Halvorsen, Kristin // Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice;2010, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p273 

    Modern work life is increasingly characterized by a shift from the traditional, hierarchical organization to more collaborative forms, often referred to as 'the post-bureaucratic organization'. Within this setting, team decision making is becoming a crucial activity for managing the complex and...

  • THE EMERGENCE OF GROUP COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON GROUP PERFORMANCE. CHOI, KYOOSANG; COEN, CORINNE // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings;2009, Vol. 2009 Issue 1, p1 

    Our study provides a theoretical model of emergent group cognitive complexity. We examine how social cognitive processes among group members influence the emergence of group cognitive complexity (i.e., group differentiation and group integration) and then, how group cognitive complexity affects...

  • Adequacy of Group Decisions as a Function of the Decision-Making Process. Holloman, Charles R.; Hendrick, Hal W. // Academy of Management Journal;Jun72, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p175 

    This study investigated the relative adequacy of six modes of group decision-making: (1) Averaged Decision, (2) Leader Decision, (3) Committee Decision, (4) Majority Vote, (5) Consensus, and (6) Consensus after Majority Vote. Increases in decision adequacy occur when groups use procedures which...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics