TITLE

Bipartisanship Possible On Patients' Bill Of Rights

AUTHOR(S)
Fisher, Mary Jane
PUB. DATE
December 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;12/14/98, Vol. 102 Issue 50, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the possible cooperation of Democrats and Republicans in the United States Congress regarding managed care reform efforts known as Patients' Bill of Rights. Names of legislators supporting the bill; Factors for expected cooperation; Comments by Health Insurance Association of America's president Chip Kahn on the need to pass the legislation.
ACCESSION #
1404074

 

Related Articles

  • Gaining ground. Weissenstein, Eric // Modern Healthcare;04/06/98, Vol. 28 Issue 14, p6 

    Reports the passage of managed care regulation bill by the Democratic Party in the United States that closely resembles the Republican Party measures. Sponsors of the bill; Provisions of the bill; Recommendation of one lobbyist on the bills passed by the Democrats and the Republican;...

  • Battle rages over managed care reform; Device manufacturers lag in Y2K compliance. Szabo, Joan // MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer;Sep98, Vol. 30 Issue 9, p14 

    Focuses on some of the major disagreements between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in passing a managed care reform measure. Differences between the Democratic and Republican bills; Details of the disagreement; Threat of the year 2000 compliance problem to medical devices.

  • Protecting patients popular, but battles loom.  // AHA News;02/15/99, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p3 

    Looks at some of the differences between key patient-protection bills introduced by Republicans and Democrats in the United States. Employee Retirement Income Security Act liability; Expanded liability for denied benefit; Health Plan Quality assurance.

  • Patient protection bill: Is it real or just political... Gatty, Bob // Dermatology Times;Aug98, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p7 

    Focuses on the dilemma faced by Republican representatives in the United States regarding the approval of managed care patient protection legislation in the US Congress. Why House Republicans negotiated a managed care proposal; Details on the patient protection plan from the Grand Old Party...

  • Senate GOP version of patient protection heads to the floor. Weinstock, Matthew // AHA News;03/22/99, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p8 

    Reports on the debate over patient protection legislation sponsored by the United States Republican. Provision under the legislation; Priority issues lost by the Democrats on the legislation.

  • GOP introduces patient bill.  // Business Insurance;02/08/99, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p22 

    Reports on the United States House Republicans' reintroduction of patient protection legislation in February 1999.

  • Don't celebrate too soon. Petitte, Karen // Modern Physician;Nov99, Vol. 3 Issue 11, p28 

    Editorial. Looks at the proposed broad patient protection legislation in the United States. Why the adoption of the House version of the patient protection bill by the full Congress would be ill-advised; Why managed care became the dominant form of health insurance in the nation; Why such...

  • Advocate says agents should support PARCA. Brostoff, Steven // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;2/16/98, Vol. 102 Issue 7, p4 

    Calls for support on the 1997 Patient Access Responsible Care Act (PARCA), a controversial legislation that would federally regulate managed care plans in the United States. Arguments of David E. Hebert, director of federal government affairs of American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, on...

  • The power of 41 - or 42. York, Byron // Hill;12/8/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 131, p15 

    The article reports on the winning of the Democratic Party over the Grand Old Party during the national election in the U.S. on November 4, 2008.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics