TITLE

The Commander Failed at Abu Ghraib

PUB. DATE
August 2004
SOURCE
U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Aug2004, Vol. 130 Issue 8, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In 1952, the destroyer Hobson (DD-464) collided with the carrier USS Wasp (CV-18). Even though the Hobson's captain was asleep in his cabin, he was held accountable by courts-martial. This issue led to an opinion piece in "The Wall Street Journal" called "Hobson's Choice" that has been seen on the bulkhead of many an at-sea cabin. The point of the article is that leaders assume ultimate responsibility—and more important, accountability—when they accept the privilege of command. So the scenes of Abu Ghraib prison—the visage of the United States Army Brigadier General Janis Karpinksi appearing on television proclaiming that she is a scapegoat, she didn't have proper guidance, she didn't have policy, or her latest excuse-du-jour is dismaying.
ACCESSION #
13987690

 

Related Articles

  • Inside the Iraq Prison Scandal. Mazzetti, Mark; Barnes, Julian E.; Pound, Edward T.; Kaplan, David E.; Robinson, Linda // U.S. News & World Report;5/24/2004, Vol. 136 Issue 18, p18 

    Discusses the investigation into the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq. Finding of Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller that United States oversight of Iraqi prisons was almost nonexistent, which he reported to Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq; Question of who is responsible for...

  • Inside Iraq's House of Horrors. Hewitt, Bill; Schlesinger, Robert; Morehouse, Macon // People;5/17/2004, Vol. 61 Issue 19, p73 

    As an Army staff sergeant facing court martial for the alleged abuse of Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad, Ivan Frederick II, 37, finds himself in an uncomfortable position. According to the Army, Frederick and six other members of the 372nd Military Police Company are at the...

  • THE IMPACT OF MILITARY JUSTICE REFORMS ON THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: HOW TO AVOID UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. Hansen, Victor // Michigan State International Law Review;2013, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p229 

    This article considers efforts to civilianize the military justice systems in Canada, the United Kingdom and other countries and how these reforms potentially impact the role of the military commander with respect to the commander's law of war obligations. One consequence of the...

  • The Joint Side of NJP: Justice from the Pool Table. Cooper, Kendall L. // Reporter;Dec98, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p32 

    Focuses on nonjudicial punishment in the United States Army and Navy. Relevance to lawyers and paralegals who serve in joint jobs; Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice; Army's right to use a summarized record of proceedings with no right to a defense counsel; Tradition of...

  • Acquisition law.  // Reporter;Mar99, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p14 

    Presents a review of recent cases involving the United States Armed Forces as of March 1999. Status of the case of AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc. v. Widnall; Ra-nav Laboratories, Inc. v. Widnall; Metric Systems Corp. v. United States.

  • Recent court decisions involving the Guard and Reserve: A military miscellany. Ogg, E. Jerald // Reporter;Jun99, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p32 

    Reports on the recent United States court decisions involving US Guard and Reserve personnel as of June 1999. Include the US Court of Appeal's decision in the case Willenbring versus Neurater; Decisions regarding the civilian employment rights of US Reserve personnel; Feres Doctrines' impact on...

  • Military Justice and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Cooke, John S.; General, Brigadier // Army Lawyer;Mar2000, Issue 328, p1 

    Discusses the history of the Uniform Code of Military Justice of the United States Armed Force as of March 2000.

  • Civilian Confinement and R.C.M. 707. Ryan, Tim // Army Lawyer;Mar2000, Issue 328, p29 

    Focuses on the impact of civilian confinement on the United States Armed Forces' delay policy for military court hearings.

  • The Art of Trial Advocacy.  // Army Lawyer;Mar2000, Issue 328, p31 

    Discusses the prior consistent statements provisions of the United States Armed Forces' military justice system as of March 2000.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics